• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Damn, time for wild thoughts as to why. I wonder who the bad guy is here. Did Sam want to focus on profit? Does the board and they’re hiding behind that? I have no idea.

    Still this is a scene right from Silicon Valley, the founder being voted out of their own company

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s more likely that Sam did not want to focus on profit as much as some investors. I presume Microsoft has seats on the board ( I haven’t checked)

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Their board is independent and as such do not have equity in the company - Microsoft is not part of this. It’s a very different dynamic.

        Based on the language, if I HAD to guess, I’d say he straight up lied to the board or acted on something without them when they were supposed to be involved. Serious charter-violating stuff.

        • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          My guess is he hid a security breach from the SEC and the board. That makes the most sense as to what would prevent the board from being able to execute on their legal duties.