• randombullet@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Needs to be changed to negligent discharge.

    There are no accidents, just negligence.

    Unless there is hardware failure, but that’s a different story

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s why my new bill would mandate that all babies receive in-womb gun-safety training. New borns are expected to complete a gun-safety test. If they fail, they’re shot and killed. We only care about life until birth.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Or if we just had mental health programs for toddlers, we wouldn’t have any issues with giving toddlers guns!

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    that the 2-year-old boy took her Taurus 9mm firearm from her purse

    Right, so the safety was off then, because there’s no way that a two-year-old could release the safety on their own. The movies make it look like you just flick it with your finger but seriously that thing does not move without a reasonable around a force.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Tbh not entirely, it could be possible, however unlikely. Honestly imo the bigger issue is off body carry in general is unsafe. Case in point your 2yo can grab it from the purse (and so can anyone else) but it’s harder to grab and easier to retain it from a real, good holster, either CCW or active retention (like cop holsters with the button) for open carry (I also generally advise against OC, but whatever.)

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a good thing that Toddler had a gun! Imagine if a gunman had decided to shoot up that Wal Mart! The Toddler could Protect itself!