One needs to send 1 mln HTTP requests concurrently, in batches, and read the responses. No more than 100 requests at a time.

Which way will it be better, recommended, idiomatic?

  • Send 100 ones, wait for them to finish, send another 100, wait for them to finish… and so on

  • Send 100 ones. As a a request among the 100 finishes, add a new one into the pool. “Done - add a new one. Done - add a new one”. As a stream.

  • dark_stang@beehaw.orgEnglish
    0·
    10 months ago

    Not enough info. What are you trying to actually accomplish here? If you’re stress testing and trying to measure how fast a server can process all those requests, use something like jmeter. You can tell it to do 100 concurrent threads with 10000 requests each, then call it a day.

    • cuenca@lemm.eeOP
      0·
      10 months ago

      Not enough info. What are you trying to actually accomplish here by asking me this question?

          • Fal@yiffit.netEnglish
            0·
            10 months ago

            Google what an XY problem is. Do you have reading comprehension problems?

            • cuenca@lemm.eeOP
              0·
              10 months ago

              You aren’t aware of the task in whole I’ve described . What I’ve described is 20% of it. You and @falsem@kbin.social are 2 fucking sorry-ass advisers.

        • Gamma@beehaw.orgEnglish
          0·
          10 months ago

          They did the same a few days ago and deleted the post before reposting

        • cuenca@lemm.eeOP
          0·
          10 months ago

          Kmz, I’m JUST trying to GET help but they’re being a bunch of cocks?

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
            0·
            10 months ago

            They’re trying to work out what problem you’re trying to solve, so they can give you actually useful advice for your - frankly - very vague question

            “What are you trying to achieve” is a perfectly reasonable question to ask about a deeply under-specified problem

            Edit: here’s my theory:

            This is a homework or interview question you’ve been asked, that depends on specific context that you haven’t included (because you don’t know what context is even relevant)

            You don’t want to admit that’s why you’re asking, because you know that defeats the point of you being asked in the first place.

            Hence, you’re being absurdly hostile to someone trying to help, because you can’t answer their question without admitting you’re trying to cheat

              • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
                0·
                10 months ago

                No, they aren’t.

                If you ask “should I make brownies or lemon drizzle cake”, it’s perfectly reasonable for them to ask “is this for an event? do the people it’s for have any preferences or allergies?”

      • Fal@yiffit.netEnglish
        0·
        10 months ago

        What the shit kind of response is this. We’re trying to get enough info to answer your question