With testimony winding down after more than two months, the Republican 2024 presidential front-runner showed up to watch an accounting professor testify about financial topics important to the case.
Trump himself is scheduled to take the stand Monday, for a second time.
I was gone on a three day weekend and didn’t think about this at all. Wasn’t on lemmy at all. That’s how much it bothered me. Not at all. If you didn’t want a reply when I got back, you should have taken your own advice and grown up. This isn’t a tantrum, my pulse hasn’t raised a bit. This had been explanations for you, not that you’re able to understand that.
your uncontrollable torrent of rage amuses me
Your impression that this is “rage” is also amusing.
it’s also funny that your anger forces you to keep coming back. i have trapped you here with your own ego. lmao. all i have to do is keep provoking you :)
Oddly enough, apparently if I keep responding, you’re also incapable of stopping yourself.
Which isn’t surprising, considering you demonstrated this lack of control to begin with.
why would i stop? i’m here for fun. you’re the one who has spent several days angrily ranting and raving. keep lying to yoruself, though. it’s funny, lol
Again, I left for three days, didn’t think about this at all. Replying to you back then and replying today doesn’t qualify as days of ranting, but I realize you have trouble with reading things. I’d wager you’re the one getting upset, because it is evident in your replies.
see, you still don’t realize that you’re not in an argument, so you can’t possibly win. i’m here to endlessly provoke your little rants and tantrums, and i’ll continue wasting your time and energy forver, and i have already won because you lack the self-control to stop.
it’s hilarious.
Strangely enough, that’s essentially the problem you had to begin with.
As said before, the reply “no fucking shit” was inherently an acknowledgment that there was a technical difference between liable and guilty, such as “no duh” or similar, but you continued arguing even though the point was acknowledged. You were arguing about something I wasn’t contesting. That is still the case, regardless how you’d prefer to remember it.
And you’re the one who kept coming back, and all these ad hominem attacks and denial are all you have left.