After a spy camera designed to look like a towel hook was purchased on Amazon and illegally used for months to capture photos of a minor in her private bathroom, Amazon was sued.

The plaintiff—a former Brazilian foreign exchange student then living in West Virginia—argued that Amazon had inspected the camera three times and its safety team had failed to prevent allegedly severe, foreseeable harms still affecting her today.

Amazon hoped the court would dismiss the suit, arguing that the platform wasn’t responsible for the alleged criminal conduct harming the minor. But after nearly eight months deliberating, a judge recently largely denied the tech giant’s motion to dismiss.

Amazon’s biggest problem persuading the judge was seemingly the product descriptions that the platform approved. An amended complaint included a photo from Amazon’s product listing that showed bathroom towels hanging on hooks that disguised the hidden camera. Text on that product image promoted the spycams, boasting that they “won’t attract attention” because each hook appears to be “a very ordinary hook.”

  • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Tech legal expert Eric Goldman wrote that a victory for the plaintiff could be considered “a dangerous ruling for the spy cam industry and for Amazon,” because “the court’s analysis could indicate that all surreptitious hook cameras are categorically illegal to sell.” That could prevent completely legal uses of cameras designed to look like clothes hooks, Goldman wrote, such as hypothetical in-home surveillance uses.

    In what reality is there any need for a door-hook camera except to spy on someone who has not given consent???

    Jayzuz. That was some poor mind gymnastics right there.

    • Poggervania@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      He could’ve used literally any other example, but of course he chose the creepy one. Could’ve stood on the stance that businesses would need them for shoplifting ffs.

      • You999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Except any place where it would make sense to place one within a business would be illegal. You are not allowed to place cameras hidden or not in places where one could have an expectation of privacy.

    • dirtypirate@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      In what reality is there any need for a door-hook camera

      maybe for when the police illegally raid, eat your lemon pound cake, steal your money and fuck up your visible cameras?

      just because YOU can’t think of any use other than creepy doesn’t mean the rest of us are so afflicted.

      • EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        None of the police actually ate Afroman’s lemon pound cake, just one stared longingly at it for an awkwardly long amount of time, lol. Let’s not muddy the waters by accusing those police of something they didn’t do, and focus on the blatantly provable (lack of real probable cause, intentionally sabotaging his cameras) and the alleged but highly plausible (“miscounting” some of his cash into their own pockets).