• Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Commerce isn’t the same as things being for-profit. And, indeed, workers getting paid is the primary thing that cuts into profits.

      Wages aren’t “personal profits”. The idea that they are is a lie the ownership class has been selling for generations.

      Profits are what you get paid for owning property, not for doing work.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Profits are what you get paid for owning property, not for doing work.

        Many farmers own their property and are very much so interested in getting paid for their work. Zero profits means only costs are being paid, the farmer very much so still wants to be paid for his work.

        • 20hzservers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          See you are still mistaken the owner and worker in your example are the same person where as in many big businesses they are two distinct groups, with the smaller (in proportion of people) owner class having most of the leverage in negotiations. To the owner if they employ others the wages they pay are a cost to their profits, with the farmer he is also his worker so his overhead beyond his operating costs is his “wage”. Both have operation costs like buying raw materials rent/taxes on properties, machine operation/repair costs. Profits are a cost that employees pay to the owners if you want my opinion on it. There’s an argument that the owners deserve some portion of this but at the moment profits are put over people because the leverage like I said earlier is in the hands of the owner class.