• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You can disagree with the electoral college and still recognize that electors are literally representatives.

    This is basic civics.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      But they aren’t really, they’re just vote messengers, they aren’t on capital hill making laws and advocating for their constituents.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        All representatives are “vote messengers.” That’s why we call them representatives.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I would disagree that senators and congressmen are just vote messengers. They run on active platforms, respond to changes in their constituencies (hopefully), deal with new issues as they arise.

          Electors literally just ferry the states vote to Washington, that’s it and job done. Representatives continually represent the will of their constituents through multiple years, or at least that’s what they are supposed to do.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            respond to changes in their constituencies

            Yes. This is being a representative.