• Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Among other things discussed ITT, ranking your second candidate higher can result in your first candidate loosing in basically a spoiler effect.

    • ammonium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I assume you mean ranking your second choice lower can make your first choice win? I would say that’s actually a great advantage of RCV, it means moderates have more chance to win. Someone who’s liked by everyone but is nobody’s favorite can win.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, ranking your second higher can make your first (and second) loose. The spoiler effect still exists, except it punishes moderates instead of extremists. If the orange party gets larger than the yellow party, it becomes an election between the greens and oranges, despite most people being okay with yellow. The compromise is unlikely to win.

        I though FPTP was so aweful that basically anything is better, but a few variants of ranked voting are nearly as bad for selecting prefered candidates, and encourage extremism, while being more complex (difficult to trust) and possibly a fraud risk (because all votes need to be processed together, double checking and anti-tampering is more difficult).