• mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Stick the examples I offered.

    No. You can accept my response as an example of groupthink being completely wrong.

    • cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Then you are strawmanning.

      Arguing the more easily defeated interpretation.

      Rather than steelmanning.

      Which means arguing the actual point.

      And to do that. Hmm. Why would anybody do that?

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Then you are strawmanning.

        That is not a straw man. The other user is simply not cooperating on the arbitrary restrictions that you’re imposing on his argument. A straw man would require him to misrepresent your position.

        You are however cherry picking.

        • cameron_vale@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Arbitrary? It’s literally the examples I offered in the title.

          Which also implies the class of “stuff they saw but we don’t see”. And he could have gone there too.

          But no. He went for the caricature.

          You people.

      • mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Based on the contents of this thread, you aren’t aware enough of fallacy to speak like an authority on it.