• theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    if he’s not on the ballot in CO, they also wouldn’t ratify his election… they may not seem big, but they have the Air Force Academy and NORAD i think…

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      How does that work, legally speaking? Have we ever had a President in the past century that had states that didn’t allow them on the ballot? Outside of having to go all the way back to like Lincoln times.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Current SCotUS is hella corrupt, but I don’t see them denying that the individual States control their own elections.

    • nicetriangle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It hurts republican downballot candidates tho. There’s gonna be a number of Trump voters who won’t show up if he’s not on the ballot and they would have been straight ticket republican votes.

      Also this sets a big precedent.

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a lose-lose. If this is shot down, it’s just another case presidents being above the law. If this goes through, the republican states will use it against democratic candidates.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    One interesting take here is that the states have complete autonomy, per the constitution, to do their elections however they want. They are only required to select a candidate and send electors as a state. So that could be a great side-step, to say “the state is deciding state election policy for a state, and this is not a federal matter.”