• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Don’t do this, but remember: the richer a person is, the bigger the ecological footprint. You are higher on that list than you might realize. Especially ecofascists tend to forget that fact.

    • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah you know what would actually be better? Fixing legislation so that the 100 companies that create the majority of pollution stop doing that

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The statistic that “Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions” is better understood as “Just 100 companies responsible for selling 71% of global fossil fuels”. It’s fundamentally saying that there’s a few large coal, oil and gas companies worldwide selling us most of the supply.

        If you want those companies to stop polluting, that amounts to those companies not selling fossil fuels.

        Which is honestly the goal, but the only way to do that is to replace the demand for fossil fuels. Cutting the US off from fossil fuels would kill a ton of people if you didn’t first make an energy grid 100% powered by renewables, got people to buy electric cars, cold climate heat pumps, etc.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lmmfao, yeah good luck with that… (hint: the people who own those companies also own the government who makes the laws, there is no reforming capitalism, it’s designed that way)

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          They own the people in government, not the government itself. Change the people, change the ownership.

          The trick is you have to start small, cause the ones in the bigger positions rely on the small ones to maintain their power.

          • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The problem is that to obtain those big pistons, you need the financial backing of those big companies. So eventually as an honest politician climbs the ladder, he has to sell out, or fizzle out. You can’t win federal elections without PAC money.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Genocide is happening right now in the current system. Some learned from past mistakes some didn’t. We can do better either way.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Even better than that is changing the system so the 100 companies are no longer around to create a majority of pollution.

      • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s true! But I think more than one “front” can be open in this battle. And we also need the ones that can be won quicker or easier. Or at least start those too.

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah - everyone is shitting on the top 1% here in Germany until they realize that half the population here makes it into that percentile and suddenly it’s the 0,1% that’s the problem.

      It’s all about putting the blame on someone else so you don’t have to question if you might be a little bit responsible, too, with your lifestyle…

      • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Half the population of Germany makes it into the global 1%? So 40 million Germans are in the 1%, a group that is 80 million people in the world?

        People severely estimate how many Westerners there are. The US alone is like 4 or 5% of the world population. If you’re in the west, you’re in the top 15% of the world, but not likely the top 1%

        • nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          They’re talking about the top 1% of Germany VS the top 1% of the world. If you reframe your thinking to be about the world instead of just your country, you might find your position as one of the 99% percent changing. I don’t make much in the USA, I certainly wouldn’t call myself rich, but just being employed, above minimum wage, and single means I’m probably above that threshold.

        • hh93@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was talking about the global 1% since that’s usually what those kind of stats are aimed at