• Tenthrow@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Please provide corroborating story link from a credible source. I will have to remove if the story link can’t be updated to a more reputable source.

      • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It was showing as middle of the road for the credibility rating, which on its own is shaky but with a corroborating report strengthens it.

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          IIRC it’s considered middle of the road due to political leanings rather than the actual credibility of the reporting.

          Which, tbh, is sort of concerning when evaluating credibility because political leanings do not change whether a report is factual or not.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If anyone is still wondering why Hamas and other resistance factions are fighting, this is what happens when the IDF wins.

    • samokosik@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      First of all, Hamas is a terrorist organization and I fully support Israel in removing it. It definitely is not a resistance group.

      However, Israel has to change the way they approach the problem. Especially limiting shenanigans like this one and using stupid bombs.

      • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ones terrorist group is another’s resistance heroes. Which is which very much depends on the side you’re sitting at.

        Hamas is indeed a terror group and should be removed but it’s hard not to see your bias. In sheer numbers, the IDF has killed multiples of what Hamas killed, in cruelty they’re really the same, and Hamas has the “excuse” of 70 years or so of oppression, murder, theft, etc by the Israeli side, the IDF doesn’t have that excuse.

        The IDF is a terrorist organisation too and the only difference is that the IDF is state sanctioned and managed, whereas Hamas is not.

        You, however, call what is starting to look like a genocide “shenanigans” that should be better managed whereas you outright call Hamas a terrorist group. Bias much?

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Fuck Hamas. They are not “resisting”, they killed innocent civilians, women and children, and don’t give a flying fuck about the Palestinian civilians either (cf Moussa Abu Marzouk’s declaration that they are not responsible for defending the civilians in Gaza). They are a creation of the Israeli apartheid regime’s own making when they were hoping to destroy the credibility of the PA, to perpetuate their colonialist narrative. Hamas and the Israeli apartheid are two sides of the same brutal, inhuman coin. Fuck Hamas as much as the Likud and the ultranationalist Israeli right to the seventh pit of hell.

      • Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s hard to not let your emotions take over, but Hamas only exists because of the hatred of Israel.

        Hamas exists because Israel doesn’t want Palestines to exist.

        Terrorist organisation typically don’t continue to exist for extended periods of time without external assistance.

        • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is silly, not mentioning Iran as the actual people training and funding Hamas is either very deceptive or evidence you have no idea about anything happening in the middle East.

          Also acting like Hamas are the only terrorist organisation in the middle East and a total novelty is absolutely absurd, when people call them freedom fighters without any reference to what they’re actually saying they’re fighting for is again totally deceptive or from a total lack of understanding - they don’t want freedom they want a theocratic dictatorship and death to all non Muslims.

          That’s not too say everything Israel have done of good or moral but painting Hamas as innocent people just fighting for their freedom is laughable

          • Specal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh blah blah blah, this whole situation is alot simpler that Israeli defence Muppets like.

            Israel is NOT a poor developing nation. Their military is on par with the UK. Their economy is doing fantastic. Quality of life in Israel is growing.

            Israel wether you like it or not are always going to be the bad guys in the situation simply because they should know better. They have been taunting, attacking and murdering Palestinians for 70 years. The only countries other than Israel that are to blame are the US and the UK.

            • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              So being successful when everyone is trying to kill you makes them bad but rich countries like Iran failing repeatedly to complete the genocides they fund makes them loveable roagues who can do no wrong?

              You’ll excuse me if I don’t subscribe to your philosophy of life.

              • Specal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Because you’re acting like it’s an army Vs an army, it’s not it’s an army Vs civilians

      • fosho@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        on the radio I heard two scholars discussing recent polls that reveal a surprisingly strong level of support for Hamas among gazans even now, despite the level of backlash that has resulted. when asked why, they said that Palestinians have long given up any hope that negotiations could achieve their goal of freedom and independence. they said that since negotiating has clearly failed for decades, Palestinians feel that the only remaining option Israel has left them is aggression and violence. and Hamas is the leadership that is willing to resort to violence.

        while I certainly feel awful about any innocent Israelis getting caught up in the original attack, I can’t help but feel like Israel has done this to themselves. they have caged an entire group like wild animals for decades and somehow have the audacity to blame them for lashing out.

        but let’s be honest here. we have all heard these points and most of us have already made up our minds about it.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Calling Hamas a resistance faction is like calling the Klan an equal rights organization.

      When mass demonstrations break out under your rule under the tag “Bedna Na3iish!”, or, “WE WANT TO LIVE!”, you are not an organization acting in the interests of those people.

      These monsters are literally the ones who caused the Arab Spring remix of “I can’t breathe!” to happen, calling them the resistance to Israel instead of the equal partner to the oppression of the Palestinian people they are is offensive to the nth degree and reeks of redwashed white savior westsplaining.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Was Native American raids on “Settlements” terrorism? Was Nat Turner’s rebellion terrorism?

        Hamas is evil and the acts they have done are evil. But they weren’t created in a vacuum. Peace and a one or two state solution needs to be agreed apone by all with a right to self determination for the cycle of evil to stop.

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do you like this group of people? If yes, freedom fighters; if not, terrorists

          Do you like this state? If yes, government; if not, regime.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I bet you’d call the Viet Cong terrorists during the Vietnam war too lol.

        This is similar to that in some regards too; similar guerilla tactics, and they’re also fighting to drive away an occupying force and reunify their country.

        Their attack on Oct 7 was brutal, but it’s nothing compared to the shit Israel has been repeatedly doing for the last half century.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You know it’s whitesplaining because their response to the Palestinian telling them to stop lionizing Hamas is to admit that all PoC militant groups look the same to them

    • machinin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Of course the IDF should investigate itself. I’m sure they are completely unbiased.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Clearly you’re right. But the UN report did not say what the article said it said. Which means it’s biased reporting.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The article prefaces every item with the word “alleged” or “alleges”, just like the report. How is this biased?

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The UN added, “While in control of the building and the civilians sheltering there, the IDF allegedly separated the men from the women and children, and then shot and killed at least 11 of the men, mostly aged in their late 20’s and early 30’s, in front of their family members.” The UN continued, “The IDF then allegedly ordered the women and children into a room, and either shot at them or threw a grenade into the room, reportedly seriously injuring some of them, including an infant and a child. OHCHR has confirmed the killings at Al Awda building.”

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Funny, how you alter the source to make it seem more clear than it is. So here is the part you altered, as reported by the OHCHR:

      ‘OHCHR has confirmed the killings at Al Awdabuilding, although the details and circumstances of the killings are still under verification.’

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just so you’re clear, the person you replied to directly quoted the article word for word

        • GenEcon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The articles miss quoted then, and should therefore should be considered heavily biased.

          • BossDj@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Cool. But you went full tilt accusation at that guy. Like FULL tilt. Just trying to throw some humble your way.

            • GenEcon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Maybe he should double check if the source he quotes is trustworthy. BTW: he hasn’t corrected his made-up quote.

              • floofloof@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                There was no made-up quote. The quote was from the article, which left the end off a sentence, saying that the circumstances are under investigation, although the killings have been confirmed. So we have survivors accusing the IDF of slaughtering these people and we have the bodies, but it has not definitively been proven that the people were killed in the way the survivors claim. People can make of that what they will. I’m not trying to twist anything.

                Here is the report (PDF):

                https://reliefweb.int/attachments/e429c0e7-9da4-4d50-9c4d-d367e91aea12/unlawful killings in Gaza City copy.pdf

                • GenEcon@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  The correct way to to cite it would be: ‘OHCHR has confirmed the killings at Al Awdabuilding […].’

                  Its simply wrong to not do it. Especially cutting of the sentence at a ‘,’.

                  And the last time a crime against humanity was still under investigation – where it was obvious that a rocket hit a hospital, but the exact circumstances where still unclear – it was later confirmed that Hamas hit the hospital.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    On one hand I can’t tell Russia or Israel apart in the headlines anymore. On the other hand polls state that Palestinians want this to happen by their support of their Government causing this?

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    WSWS isn’t a great source because it’s based on a cause.

    However, here’s the report.

    It’s uh… Not good.

    At what point does the Foreign Assistance Act’s ban on sending aid to countries in violation of human rights standards come into play? It seems like we’re getting a report on a new war crime every few days, which is a breathtaking rate for a professional Army.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Genocide Joe removed any restriction of human rights violations on the aid for israel so until you vote him out

      • Veneroso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh yes because Trump would use our forces to do it instead.

        Look, don’t counter with 3rd party. That’s literally throwing your vote away.

        Biden is the only way to beat Trump. There are backwards racists in the Democrats too. You’re not going to get support for anything than an old white guy until at least 2028…

  • Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hamas is shit for putting terror and attacking Israel above taking care of their own civilians. Israel is shit for mass-execution of innocent civilians.

    They’re both shit, but we all know this will only end with Israel exterminating an entire population, which is even shittier.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technically, Hamas aren’t Palestinian in origin to begin with, they’re from a group that once controlled Egypt and their power over Gaza Strip was maintained by the Israeli Government via various means including directly being funded by them and neighboring nations. So, it isn’t their people. The don’t give a fuck if Palestine faces genocide, never have.

    • Orionza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The reason Hamas is in existence is because their peoples’ homes being taken and the Palestinians being killed constantly, for years. What would you do if your nation has lived in their land for ages, and a people came and took your family homeland and killed your family, and took neighborhoods and whole swaths of areas, then penned you up so that you couldn’t exit or enter your country without their permission…don’t you think you’d rise up with some other warriors to do something, anything? That’s what Hamas is. It is not a terrorist organization to go out and cause terror and trouble. It is the fighting representative of a beaten people.

      • butterflyattack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It is not a terrorist organization to go out and cause terror and trouble.

        Did you not notice the events that started this recent shit? Hamas certainly engages in terrorism, as does the IDF.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only solution I see is to build a wall around the whole area and just waiting for the shooting to stop eventually.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        But it is a both sides situation. Both sides have the same goal. Externinating the other. One side is just much more powerful.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why not? It’s the one fundamental differences when comparing this conflict with the Nazi extermination of jews (and others).

        The jews didn’t massacre German civilians before their attempted annihilation.

        It’s not much of a difference, in the entire score of things, but both Hamas and the idf have blood on their hands. Neither have done things benificial to the Palestinian people. The October attack was a strategic mistake of the highest order.

        At the time support for the Netanyahu regime was falling, people were demonstrating. They had literally nothing to gain. They actually played right into bibi’s hand.

        Not that I approve of the Israeli reaction, it’s horrible and indeed a case study on the banality of evil. It is completely outside of all proportions. To say that only one side is to blame, is wrong. Without oct 7 this would never have happened. To deny that you would have to prove that it was a false flag attack.

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I do get the analogy of the Warsaw ghetto, I’ve used the same analogy before.

            But the relationship between hamas and the Israeli governement is very curious. If say I’m not on the both sides kind of thing, but on the ‘one of three’. The Palestinian people are suffering under the war mongering of both hamas and the idf. Just like not one hundred procent of Israelis are behind the actions of the idf, most Palestinian people aren’t responsable for the actions of Hamas.

            It’s way more complicated than the binary issue you lot try to make it off it and frankly that is tiring and obtuse.

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    When the culture and the legal system that is supposed to punish illegal activity like this, fails to do its job, the message to each individual is clear if not codified.

    Behave as you want, because your leadership controls the information coming out to the wider world. Journalists are intimidated and killed.

    If you are discovered, you will be quietly reassigned but not actually disciplined. Protests from the UN or other nations are dismissed using various tired phrases or tactics.

    If you actually go to trial, the state will bow to pressure from the public and government officials and not sufficiently punish you for even crimes like murder. 18 months for a summary execution that was clearly premeditated and filmed. It doesn’t matter if the prosecution proves mens rea or that you were filmed loading a weapon first before slow walking over to your victim. You will get a downgraded charge to manslaughter and the broad public will push for your immediate release.