• Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is how he needs to lose. A systemic refusal to allow a traitor to America to hold power.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      All we need is one defecting GOP SC justice to bar him from the entire country’s general election. Cross your fingers.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Colorado might not be the only state to prohibit former President Donald Trump from being on the 2024 presidential ballot.

    The decision does not go into effect until January 2024, giving Trump’s campaign weeks to appeal.

    Derek Muller, an election law professor at the University of Notre Dame’s Law School, told the Associated Press that the state supreme court’s decision poses a “major threat” to Trump’s 2024 campaign.

    Colorado was the first state to bar Trump from being on the ballot, but it’s not the only one that’s seen similar legal challenges.

    The Minnesota Supreme Court, for example, was presented earlier in the year with a similar opportunity, though it ruled in favor of Trump.

    The state of Michigan also received a challenge from the same group behind Minnesota’s attempt: Free Speech For People.


    The original article contains 297 words, the summary contains 134 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • shininghero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do it. And when his adherents make their little death threats…
    Take more things away from Trump, and say it’s a direct result of his adherents actions.

    Parental discipline™, coming soon to a political office near you!

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Didn’t the Michigan Supreme Court already rule on this? I remember the Secretary of State saying she didn’t want to make that decision and was glad the court ruled as quickly as they did.

    –Oh, I see, it was a lower court, now being appealed to the Supremes–