• VioletTeacup@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    In fairness, it’s less controversial and more that the line is outright offensive. At the time, people were being murdered by acts of terrorismin in the troubles, so to wontonly say that those attacks are effective and will get results was extremely insensitive. It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism shortly after it happened, or the 2015 Paris attacks.

    That being said, it’s still an interesting point that Data raises in the episode.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism shortly after it happened

      here’s the thing, though: by no measure could this statement be considered even remotely true. if someone, very boldly, were, today, try to make the argument that “the Troubles were worth it,” I dare say that they’d have a good case for that argument, despite the heavy controversy which would come with it. The argument you propose, conversely, lacks the obvious evidentiary support required to substantiate such… an ambitious arguments yours.

      And I certainly don’t support it.

      edit: it’s a matter of factual and evidentiary support. come back with evidence to support your claims.