I remember reading somewhere (probably my high school textbook) that one of the reasons people don’t like wind power being built is they cause visual pollution.

In my opinion, I think it would be pretty cool to just look out my window and see a giant windmill there, the opposite of visual pollution.

    • macaroni1556@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Let alone power plants billowing steam and smoke

      And they don’t damage the environment as much as a hydro dam

      And nowhere as ugly as giant farms of solar

      Honestly its probably the BEST looking power source

    • themelm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ah pump jacks are satisfying to watch too. And I mean derricks are temporary. But I’ve always liked windmills.

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. Do does most things humans build. Certainly better than a power plant, shopping center, warehouse, or even many houses and office buildings.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    They look better than smoke stacks

    And in all honesty they remind me of like a leisurely creek or small waterfall in that they kinda just keep going on in a pleasant consistent kind of way ya know?

    Basically what I’m saying is that they’re pretty IMO

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    No.

    I’m not a coal industry propagandist, so the only opinion I have on wind turbines is to build more of the fucking things.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I find them comforting in a reassuring, kinda awe inspiring way. Like, they’re a visual sign of at least trying to address climate change, and there’s something about having a giant, obviously artificial moving structure towering over the landscape that just gives me a sense of thrill and wonder that we are capable of building that. Those things are pretty massive if you get anywhere close to one, after all.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Like with anything, too much of it will look/taste/smell/sound bad.

    Is that a reason in and of itself to not build wind power plants? No.

    Personally I find wind power plants to look cool, a bit sci-fi and futuristic.

    The argument that they are ugly is dumb, using a term like “visual pollution” is just a way to try and make a subjective oppinion sound like objective fact.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. I would not want a row of them in my way looking out over the wilderness that I live next to.

    Looking out over the town or farmland I don’t really care.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A little bit, in the same way that any man made structure does. But they’re quite peaceful to look at and compared to a nuclear or coal plant they’re way better to look at.

    I wouldn’t like to see them in an area of outstanding beauty, but I’m cool with them anywhere else.

    Slight nitpick: they’re wind turbines, not windmills. Windmills are used to grind things down, like wheat into flour.

  • HububBub@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, I like the rhythmic visual quality. And on a conscious level they make me feel happy about clean electricity. I see windmills every single day and they do not get old for me.

  • Onii-Chan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This complaint about wind power has always come across as the kind of thing people say because they heard somebody else say it. imo, it’s just stupid people who desperately want to have an opinion on the topic weighing in with the only piece of criticism they’ve overhead some Sky News host parrot at some point in the past, and because that host had authority on the matter in their minds, it gives them some kind of false confidence to then go forward and proclaim the visual pollution argument, as if it has any real basis in anything.

  • MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think they look really cool. I can’t get the rage about a friggin’ giant electricity producing machine but they’re fine with billboards everywhere.