Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox’s relevance should be spiking right now due to Google’s shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Opposite of my experience, FF + uBlock Origin made browsing the web on my phone enjoyable because the filtering of ads makes page layouts readable.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’ve found the reason it’s not great on mobile is because even if you tell your android phone to use Firefox as default it simply ignores it and uses chrome anyways

      Edit: I was able to get it to work properly as my default browser but I had to disable chrome in the app settings. Now it’s great

    • vvv@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use Firefox on all my devices and couldn’t be happier with it. I especially love how sync works: there’s options to both pull tabs from other devices, and push to them. Quite frequently I’d be just browsing on my phone and send a tab over to my laptop to deal with/read/act on when I’m sitting down at a bigger screen.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      What’s bad about it? It’s the only way to use an ad blocker on mobile