Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven’t gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers’ salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract “credible people to run for office.”

  • CrazyEddie041@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If they’re struggling, then maybe they should pick up a second job, maybe cancel some of those subscription services?

      • Poggervania@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hell, maybe even pull themselves up by their bootstraps?

        In all seriousness, if you can’t live off a $175k salary in a country where the most expensive state requires you to make like $110k a year alone to live comfortably, that’s a you problem.

        • fenynro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I have no love for our politicians, at all, but that’s somewhat misrepresentative of the situation.

          They’re not spending their money only in one state. They usually have to maintain multiple residences, one in their home state and another in the notoriously expensive DC metro area. DC cost of living eats a significant chunk of that value, I’m sure

          • Poggervania@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            TIL something new - I did not realize they have to have homes in both their home state and in DC. Actually, I’m kind of surprised that’s how it worked, and it’s shitty if the government doesn’t provide them COLA or something if they have to have two homes.

  • Encode1307@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is why only rich people that don’t give a shit about normal people end up in Congress. Regular people can’t afford to be in Congress.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you can’t live on 170k a year, you probably shouldn’t be making decisions for those on 30k.

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If inflation has eaten away at your 6 figure salary that hasn’t been updated since 2009 imagine how the plebs making $7.25/hr feel.

  • Brennan Stehling@sfba.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    @MicroWave @steinbring We should not increase their pay. Instead we should simply provide housing connected with public transit so members of Congress can cut some of their costs and actually experience what it is like to live this way. They already get great healthcare and access to a fitness center and cafeteria.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah. After all, bribes are legal in Washington as long as you don’t say out loud what they’re for. And insider trading is hardly contained, politicians who have no prior experience with stocks suddenly consistently outperforming the market.

        There’s even a Nancy Pelosi stock tracker for you to profit (less than her since she doesn’t have to announce in real time) on the insider trading of her and her husband!

        In Washington, the corruption is not just overlooked, it’s written into the rules and demanded by party leaders 🤬

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, everyone: he just said 12% of the United States population are millionaires. More than one out of every 10 people. Think about that.

      Guess how net worth looks for the bottom 88%.

      Wealth disparity in this country is insane.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Hey, everyone: he just said 12% of the United States population are millionaires. More than one out of every 10 people. Think about that.

        First, that’s the absolute highest estimate of anyone halfway credible.

        Second, that includes real estate holdings. If you own a house anywhere even halfway desirable but don’t have a penny to your name otherwise, you’re usually still a millionaire.

        Guess how net worth looks for the bottom 88%.

        Absolutely 3rd world country atrocious. For some of the top 12% too, once you take their house out of the equation and only count the wealth they can spend without becoming homeless.

        Wealth disparity in this country is insane.

        Definitely. Anyone who says otherwise is either an idiot, part of the problem, or both.

  • 000@fuck.markets
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It’s almost like being a public servant isn’t intended to make you wealthy. $174k per Congressperson is more than double the average household income, so they can make it work.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Maybe they should have thought of that at some point in the last 44 years instead of destroying the socioeconomic mobility of the lower- and middle-class in the country. Now the leopard is eating their face, too, and it’s extremely appropriate.