• NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know burning a fire isn’t the same as driving cars, planes, busses, heating houses with natural gas, oil, coal, etc right? You’re just being obtuse now, on purpose, and I don’t know why…

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For your batshit stated goal of “zero emissions no matter what”, they absolutely are the same thing. A fire is emissions.

      But again. Even theoretically going back to fire would only be possible if you exterminated the overwhelming majority of humanity.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Zero emissions can be achieved with renewable energy sources. There are lots of them. Nothing bat shit crazy about that. You’ve bought in to some serious propaganda unfortunately. We have the technology at this very moment to switch over fully renewable sources. But we haven’t because of money.

        It’s sad that this is considered a controversial point of view at all. Its been so highly politicized, for what, money, over the billions of lives we are going to lose in the coming decades?

        That’s the real insanity here, not what I advocate for.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are emissions from the manufacturing process. There will be emissions from recycling, there will be emissions period. Zero emissions is not realistic.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Right, we should just accept the planet will become uninhabitable. That’s your message right now. And that’s the real insanity.