• Jojo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      She is a terrible bigot, and a loud one, and that sucks because she also produced a cultural phenomenon of my childhood, and while the canon of HP is only just barely pretty okay sometimes, it spiralled out from there and SO MUCH of the media and culture I’ve consumed and existed within since then has been informed by it.

      So yeah. If there’s any comfort, let it be that any money she gets from this comes from explicitly affirming a trans woman through the work, as well as implicitly affirming any trans players through the character creation options. Small comfort maybe, but she is far away.

      • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly, considered it even though I haven’t pirated a game in like twenty years. But when I found out the the person who cracked the game is also a hateful bigot, I didn’t even want to download their work. Nah, I’ll buy it second hand.

  • marxistsynths19@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I can’t believe this made so much money. If I had a pc, I still wouldn’t pirate it. Millennials need to collectively get over Harry Potter.

  • angrytoadnoises@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    HogLeg’s success is pretty crazy if you think about it. Ignoring the sales we’ve looking at today, take yourself back to the launch of HogLeg. It kept up pace with Fallout 4 in terms of active players and achievement completion rates. This is huge to me. They’re both singleplayer RPGs, so they’re both vying for the same type of audience.

    But.

    Fallout 4 was a hugely anticipated sequel to one of the most renowned series in all of gaming. Harry Potter had almost no presence in gaming beyond nostalgic shovel ware titles.

    Fallout 4 was developed by gaming darlings, a company known for producing huge open worlds with strong volumes of content. HogLeg was developed by shovelware developers with no major releases in their history.

    Fallout 4 is a first person looter shooter, one of the most ubiquitous and successful genres out there. HogLeg is an action roleplaying game, still admittedly a safe genre but doesn’t have the genre conventions that makes it possible for anyone with FPS experience to pick up a Fallout.

    And finally, Fallout 4 targeted gamers. It’s a gamer’s game, you know? It’s for lore nerds and RPG fans and tacticool nuts and all the rest. HogLeg was for Harry Potter fans. It needed to drag fans across media types to secure a big enough audience.

    I truly, truly did not expect HogLeg to find the success it has. And to be honest, it’s quite a mid game! It’s a visual accomplishment and adherence to the universe means that it’s a treat for any Harry Potter nerds, but the rest of the game is as close as generic as it could get.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      And finally, Fallout 4 targeted gamers. It’s a gamer’s game, you know? It’s for lore nerds and RPG fans and tacticool nuts and all the rest. HogLeg was for Harry Potter fans. It needed to drag fans across media types to secure a big enough audience.

      This is… perhaps, the very formula for its success. Perhaps the gaming crowd isn’t that big. Perhaps, HL was not chained to a particular demographic and instead had the freedom to appeal to a wider audience.

      I know of people who picked up a controller for the first time in their life because HL was a Harry Potter game… just saying.

      • Gaia [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I feel like their logic is circular. Choosing to actively ignore the fact that the game is based off one of the most popular book series in the entire world is frustratingly dense, and feels like they’re stanning for the sake of it. From what I understand, the game is ridiculously repetitive, and is genuinely riding solely off of the popularity of the book series.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    A racist a transphobe and an antisemite walk into a bar. The bartender looks up and says “aren’t you that girl who wrote HP?”

    JQ Lolling stares unflinchingly ahead and states “Your teacher, Professor Eleazar Fig, dies at the end of Hogwarts Legacy. This happens in all possible endings and can’t be changed. Oh and Rookwood is the one who cursed Anne while the goblins were framed. Also, you’re also required to quell a slave uprising and you have no choice in the matter.”

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is this game really that good? I’ve been holding out on buying it.

    • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s fun, lemmy/reddit screeches (rightfully so) about JKR’s views but that doesn’t mean the game itself is bad.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      My wife is a big Harry Potter fan but has mixed feelings about it. She described the game this morning as not great but not bad either, with great graphics, but also with an indecisiveness to it that suggests too many cooks in the kitchen.

      With that said, that’s just one opinion. The game seems outstandingly popular. She felt it’s worth the money if you can get it on sale in her personal opinion.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thanks! I think I’ll hold off on this title. I don’t have much time for gaming and open world games can be got it miss for me. This one sounds like it might be a miss.

      • eRac@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        My wife and I had the same opinion. Magical to run around the castle for a few hours and do the early classes, surprisingly good combat mechanics, but then… Nothing.

        It is really hurt by the inclusion of brooms. They necessitate a huge world so you can’t cross it in a minute, but then it’s too spread out and empty. At least in Ghost Recon my world-design-crippling flying devices have rockets and gattling guns.

        • Mickey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Totally agree with this. The first few hours were great but then when you get the broom and you see the huge open space that’s just really lacking. I really wish it never went to that scale.

        • potemkinhr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You may hit the nail on the head, once you get the broom you just breeze past everyhring. The forbidden forest may be the most dense content wise on foot, everything after that does feel more sparse as it was designed with the broom in mind. All in all I still enjoyed the game and got my moneys worth out of it, I did pick it up rather cheap on a sale

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a casual game that lets you run around the world of harry potter casting spells at people and things, solving puzzles, and wearing silly wizard clothes. If that sounds good to you then it’s good.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a standard open world game. If that appeals to you and you love HP then perhaps.

  • java@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Oh no somebody doesn’t like trans people, let’s shit in comments about a moderately related game for like forever /s

    You want acceptance, but you can’t accept the fact that somebody disagrees with you. That’s pathetic.

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re on the beehaw instance, bee nice.

      It makes absolute sense that people are passionately against this game, which puts money directly in the pockets of not only a very vocal transphobe with a huge following-but one who actively finances anti-trans causes. The game itsself has its own incredibly problematic issues, but I focus on the transphobia because that’s what your comment was concerned with.

      Quite frankly, yes, we want acceptance. But “acceptance” of trans people as people who have human rights should be the bare minimum. That is in no way comparable to pushing back against this game, or pushing back against JKR.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Moderately related” as in “written by and with royalties paid to”

      People, and trans people especially, absolutely have good reason to not want to buy a product that directly funds a person who is actively hostile to their existence.

      You can’t deal with critical comments from a community who are directly affected by the actions of a major stakeholder? That’s pathetic.

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        what has she even said exactly about trans people, ‘actively hostile to their existence’ sounds like shes called for genocide???

        • rainynight65@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          She actively campaigns against trans rights and has said that if you buy her stuff, you support her position.

          • jackpot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            shes wrong about the second part if she said that, it just means you dont care enough about their position (/ them) to stop you or you believe in art ≠ artist. about the first part, it’s too vague for me to take a stance on. if shes called for their deaths thats horrific. if she said that trans minors should get a 40 minute psych checkup before irreversible surgery, i couldnt care less.

            • rainynight65@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I suggest you do your own research then. From everything I’ve read, JKR is a horrible person and virulently anti-trans. There are a lot of ways to br horrific without outright calling for people’s deaths.

              • jackpot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                i dont put that much weight on some random authors societal takes to research them. if shes calling to take away trans peoples votes or for them to be removed from the work force or something insane thats wrong. if shes just saying ‘idc about peoples preferred pronouns’ i couldnt gaf, shes one person of billions, so what honestly.

                • rainynight65@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  She’s one person influencing millions, if not billions, that’s for sure. She’s not some random author, she is one of the most well known personalities of the 20th and 21st century. Her opinions carry weight, as misguided as that may be on the part of her followers.

                  I’d partially agree with you if we were talking about some random who has sold a few hundred kindle copies of their book on Amazon and is spewing nonsense. And even then I’d call for people to not support that author in any way shape or form. JKR is however hugely influential, and that absolutely should matter when it comes to deciding who you give your money to.

        • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          First: she doesn’t need to say anything specifically or explicitly to be a transphobe actively hostile to the existence of trans people.

          Second: she says things and creates spaces that are very specifically and explicitly hostile to the existence of trans people.

          Third: she associates with and collaborates with people who openly advocate for “reductions in trans people”.

          Honestly I could go through my understanding of her issue, but many people have spoken at great length about why her behavior is harmful. If you’re truly interested seek them out.

          • jackpot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            ‘hostile to the existence of trans people’ “reductions in trans people”

            either she genuinely wants genocide or youre being intentuonally misleading, this sounds like hitler describing jews.

              • jackpot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                thats horrible but if so thats totally illegal and she’d be imprisoned, can you provide a source.

                • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  You can search up “jk Rowling transphobic” or “jk Rowling anti trans” and you’ll find a plethora of sources yourself, this isn’t really a controversial thing. She’s the most well loved transphobe in the world.

          • jackpot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            for anyone else who hasnt heard this term before:

            Sealioning Sealioning is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity, and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.

            does that sum up what you think i said lmao?