A bill set to be introduced next month would ban consuming or producing sexual content and punish offenders with prison sentences of up to 20 years and $25,000 fines.

this country is so fucking cool

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    0·
    6 months ago

    Let me guess: his wife caught him watching gay porn and since he is a good Christian he wants to save others from falling into the same trap? And now his wife is really proud of him?

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    0·
    6 months ago

    I can’t believe it’s men who want this law, it sounds like a feminist wet dream. Marriages are going to the rise, but at what cost? Who’s benefiting and where’s the money behind it?

    In strict Islamic countries like pakistan, afganistan, yemen+ many middleeastern countries and some provinces in bangladish, india and so on…, men have 0 access to pussy; it’s all illegal: no porn, no escorts, and no girlfriends are allowed, ( gay is not even an option on this list). so everyone gets married early, and there’s hardly any grown person who is not, but these laws are miserable for men

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      0·
      6 months ago

      I mean, SWERFs are a thing, but that they are a meaningful category is in major part because they don’t represent mainline feminist thought.

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    0·
    6 months ago

    I wonder how easily one could “discover” search and sext history for those backing this bill… and accidently leaving it where their constituents could see how black that pot actually is.

  • BoBTFish@kbin.social
    0·
    6 months ago

    I’m not from the USA, I thought a felony is a crime at the national level, not the state level? How can a state specify that?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      0·
      6 months ago

      Felony is more about severity and consequences.
      Misdemeanors punishable by a fine or “short” jail term, and a felony by more than a year in prison.

      Felonies can also bring penalities like being barred from certain jobs forever, restrictions on firearm ownership and depending on state loosing the ability to vote.

      Below those are things like traffic tickets or citations, which are typically a small fine and don’t involve a trial, unless you ask to talk to a judge.

      Federal vs state is a question of jurisdiction rather than severity. You don’t hear about federal misdemeanors very often because federal prosecutors are more interested in things like “interstate smuggling” than “someone urinated in public on the lawn of the Des Moines Federal building”.
      Or the weird “shot a burro from a helicopter”.

      Personally, I think we really need a crackdown on airborne donkey hunting. (/S)

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    0·
    6 months ago

    Everyone involved in pushing this law should be barred from working in government, and fined for wasting our time.

    • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
      0·
      6 months ago

      Just let them pass it then search their browser history. You know the only reason they’re so concerned about it is they’re ball’s deep into it.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    0·
    6 months ago

    This is in response to all male Republicans feeling terribly inadequate after seeing Hunter Biden’s hog (thank you MTG!). I’m sure they all think the only way to please a woman is to have a large unit. lol.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    6 months ago

    i dont understand how things like this can even be pushed to begin with.

    It’s like banning a word because it makes you think of things that are somewhat unpleasant.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    0·
    6 months ago

    I wish I didn’t live in my COMMUNIST blue state where I can freely watch porn, read books, receive healthcare, feed hungry kids, breath clean air, turn around in driveways without getting shot and an abortion if I or my 10 year old daughter gets RAPED! I would MUCH rather live in a Red State where it’s only legal to shoot homeless people, go to church and breath fumes from the coal plant next door unless it gets too cold and I freeze to death!

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    6 months ago

    The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

    Ok then, every piece of sexual content I produce or consume is in political protest of this specific bill. That should hold up in court. Bust one for Dusty!

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      0·
      6 months ago

      This should be turned around like what was done with Rick Santorum (Santorum. Def: "the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.")

      Back at the beginning of Google-bombing, this was one of the early incredibly successful campaigns. This one wasn’t a neologism, but was another one that should be remembered just in case the ghoul Ann Coulter ever reemerges: I fucked Ann Coulter in the ass - hard.

      We just need a good one for Dusty Deevers.

      • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyiEnglish
        0·
        6 months ago

        How about - Deever: The bifurcation of the urine stream out of the male sex organ

        It plays on the sound of diverge, and is absolutely a thing people would want a word for. It will grow naturally as groups of dudes laughingly complain about it. And I bet old skeever deever will hate it.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      0·
      6 months ago

      Wait…

      You’re telling me that “Hentai is art” is a legal defense to this law, then?

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      0·
      6 months ago

      He’s just mad because he was born old. When they did the cracker jack at his fraternity, he could only season the cracker with a shot of of ol dusty.