- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion@kbin.social
- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion@kbin.social
this country is so fucking cool
Let me guess: his wife caught him watching gay porn and since he is a good Christian he wants to save others from falling into the same trap? And now his wife is really proud of him?
Committing felonies is really hot.
I can’t believe it’s men who want this law, it sounds like a feminist wet dream. Marriages are going to the rise, but at what cost? Who’s benefiting and where’s the money behind it?
In strict Islamic countries like pakistan, afganistan, yemen+ many middleeastern countries and some provinces in bangladish, india and so on…, men have 0 access to pussy; it’s all illegal: no porn, no escorts, and no girlfriends are allowed, ( gay is not even an option on this list). so everyone gets married early, and there’s hardly any grown person who is not, but these laws are miserable for men
I mean, SWERFs are a thing, but that they are a meaningful category is in major part because they don’t represent mainline feminist thought.
Make America Gilead Again.
Sen. Dusty Deevers
This totally sounds like a pornstar name lol
Looks like a massive pedo
I wonder how easily one could “discover” search and sext history for those backing this bill… and accidently leaving it where their constituents could see how black that pot actually is.
But after it’s passed of course. That’d be the quickest a law was ever annulled.
I’m not from the USA, I thought a felony is a crime at the national level, not the state level? How can a state specify that?
Felony is more about severity and consequences.
Misdemeanors punishable by a fine or “short” jail term, and a felony by more than a year in prison.Felonies can also bring penalities like being barred from certain jobs forever, restrictions on firearm ownership and depending on state loosing the ability to vote.
Below those are things like traffic tickets or citations, which are typically a small fine and don’t involve a trial, unless you ask to talk to a judge.
Federal vs state is a question of jurisdiction rather than severity. You don’t hear about federal misdemeanors very often because federal prosecutors are more interested in things like “interstate smuggling” than “someone urinated in public on the lawn of the Des Moines Federal building”.
Or the weird “shot a burro from a helicopter”.Personally, I think we really need a crackdown on airborne donkey hunting. (/S)
Everyone involved in pushing this law should be barred from working in government, and fined for wasting our time.
Just let them pass it then search their browser history. You know the only reason they’re so concerned about it is they’re ball’s deep into it.
No more sex in Oklahoma. It’s a dry nethers state.
This is in response to all male Republicans feeling terribly inadequate after seeing Hunter Biden’s hog (thank you MTG!). I’m sure they all think the only way to please a woman is to have a large unit. lol.
i dont understand how things like this can even be pushed to begin with.
It’s like banning a word because it makes you think of things that are somewhat unpleasant.
I wish I didn’t live in my COMMUNIST blue state where I can freely watch porn, read books, receive healthcare, feed hungry kids, breath clean air, turn around in driveways without getting shot and an abortion if I or my 10 year old daughter gets RAPED! I would MUCH rather live in a Red State where it’s only legal to shoot homeless people, go to church and breath fumes from the coal plant next door unless it gets too cold and I freeze to death!
I agree with most of this, but don’t act like your healthcare is enough if you live in the US.
The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.
Ok then, every piece of sexual content I produce or consume is in political protest of this specific bill. That should hold up in court. Bust one for Dusty!
This should be turned around like what was done with Rick Santorum (Santorum. Def: "the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.")
Back at the beginning of Google-bombing, this was one of the early incredibly successful campaigns. This one wasn’t a neologism, but was another one that should be remembered just in case the ghoul Ann Coulter ever reemerges: I fucked Ann Coulter in the ass - hard.
We just need a good one for Dusty Deevers.
How about - Deever: The bifurcation of the urine stream out of the male sex organ
It plays on the sound of diverge, and is absolutely a thing people would want a word for. It will grow naturally as groups of dudes laughingly complain about it. And I bet old skeever deever will hate it.
I’m down with it; you have my vote.
Dusty Deevers is a cartoon name
Wait…
You’re telling me that “Hentai is art” is a legal defense to this law, then?
it’s a story about the love between two people!
He’s just mad because he was born old. When they did the cracker jack at his fraternity, he could only season the cracker with a shot of of ol dusty.
What a terrible day to have eyes
Both of those are constitutionally illegal.
Let’s ask the Supreme Court what do they think.
…
They’re on a private plane with a billionaire. Will get back to us later.
😳
Obscenity is not protected by the first amendment.
Not sure why you’re downvoted. You are correct: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/obscenity#:~:text=Obscenity is not protected under,obscenity laws are criminal offenses.
Good thing porn isn’t obscene