BrikoX@lemmy.zip to Framework Laptop Community@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agoReview: Framework’s Laptop 16 is unique, laudable, fascinating, and flawedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.dev
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkReview: Framework’s Laptop 16 is unique, laudable, fascinating, and flawedarstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zip to Framework Laptop Community@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: linux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.dev
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoApparently Framework sent out a bunch of flawed test units to reviewers. That’s why some reviewers had drastically different experiences. That was an epic fail.
minus-squareGnomeComedy@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoThe question is are the production run also flawed?
minus-squaremorrowind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 months agoThey’re pre-production units and fw is a small company. This isn’t the first time this has happened. They’ve managed to fix the issues in the past
Apparently Framework sent out a bunch of flawed test units to reviewers. That’s why some reviewers had drastically different experiences. That was an epic fail.
The question is are the production run also flawed?
They’re pre-production units and fw is a small company.
This isn’t the first time this has happened. They’ve managed to fix the issues in the past