‘…(he) claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media…’
Am I the only one here old enough to realize 12 years ago this argumentation chain would have been hilarious?
Not that I support human trafficking, but damn news writers nowadays are at the very best lazy as shit.
‘…(he) claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media…’
Am I the only one here old enough to realize 12 years ago this argumentation chain would have been hilarious?
Not that I support human trafficking, but damn news writers nowadays are at the very best lazy as shit.
What’s the argument here?
Whom are you criticizing? News writers? Tate? What argument is occurring?