lawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 8 måneder sidenClimate Summitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageClimate Summitlemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 8 måneder sidenmessage-square113fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenThe reason would be to not cost so much…
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenI do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenWhat conversation are we having?
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenIt would cost far more to not address the issue.
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 måneder sidenNo, it’s making fun of that assumption.
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
The reason would be to not cost so much…
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
I do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
What conversation are we having?
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
Correct
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.