• schroedingershat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not true. In fact, very much the opposite is true, nuclear plants are vastly more compact

    Distributed solar and agrivoltaics have 0 or negative land use and require less material than a nuclear reactor. Whereas low-yield uranium resource (like Inkai) has a lower area specific power than a dedicated utility solar install.

    Distributed solar + battery also has the effect of massively reducing strain on transmission. A household that previously had a summer peak consumption of 20kW, a summer average of 2kW and a winter max daily average of 1kW can now be fed with 800W of transmission instead of 20kW. Results are less extreme in high latitude but it can still halve.

    • dmrzl@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if I might add: access to large amounts of water is also an infrastructure and France is already running out of it.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also true.

        Along with an enrichment industry (building one rather than paying russia will get your country coup’d, bombed or cyberattacked), and waste processing/permament storage (of which there is one small token facility in finland that might work, and numerous projects that failed to contain their waste and had to be cleaned for hundreds of millions to billions).

        Then there is the milling and mining waste which is usually abandoned on indigenous land or in a developing country.