• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    But with limited funds, shouldn’t we go for the biggest bang for our buck regarding the environment?

    • xlash123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It likely depends. From a time efficiency perspective, doing both would be best. If money is the bottleneck, then it’s probably best to find more money (tax the rich please?) or make budget adjustments so that time is the bottleneck instead (it is a climate emergency after all). I’ve heard that it is cheaper to maintain compact and mixed-use zoning areas over the classic strip mall with parking lots common across North America, and that could be enough for cities to see reorganizing the infrastructure as an investment over paying increasing maintenance costs. Of course that’s a big up front cost, but it over time it would be cheaper.

      It seems like we do disagree on the exact impact both options have, which could help in deciding the priority. I don’t have any data to prove either side on this one, but if you know of any sources on that, I would love to see it.