US transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg on Monday said human drivers must pay attention at all times after videos emerged of people wearing what appeared to be Apple’s recently released Vision Pro headset while driving Teslas.

Buttigieg responded on Twitter/X to a video that had more than 24m views of a Tesla driver who appeared to be gesturing with his hands to manipulate a virtual reality field.

Despite their names, Tesla’s assisted driving features – Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving – do not mean the vehicles are fully autonomous, Buttigieg said Monday on social media.

“Reminder – ALL advanced driver assistance systems available today require the human driver to be in control and fully engaged in the driving task at all times,” Buttigieg said.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The complete disregard for road safety and personal well-being (not to mention the well-being of others) never ceases to amaze me.

    I see several videos every day on social media of people taking videos while driving.

    Saw another guy doing a (very unimportant) delivery with a trailer across state in a clapped-out old van on the 1 day of the year there was ice on the road, and predictably crashed badly.

  • Mahonia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is one of the things about assisted driving tech that’s always confused me. It seems unlikely that we will have fully self-driving cars soon, but the illusion of being able to be absent while driving seems really dangerous. It doesn’t seem like an improvement to me to remove the human element from most of the driving tasks while also requiring that human to spring into action seemingly at random.

    Like don’t get me wrong, people do dumb shit on the road with or without assistance, but having a system that requires human involvement at a zero-to-hero level seems like a bad system.

    Then again, based on this actual content, maybe people just shouldn’t be allowed to own vehicles full stop.

    • anivia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It seems unlikely that we will have fully self-driving cars soon

      Maybe not from Tesla, but Mercedes already sells 2 cars which have limited Level 3 self driving functionality. Up to 50 mph you are legally allowed to divert your attention from the road and do something else, you just need to be ready to take back control within 10 seconds of the car telling you to do so. Mercedes is so confident in that system that they are taking legal liability for any crashes caused while the car is in self driving mode. And Mercedes is already planning to get the car certified for speeds up to 75mph soon, so it will be usable at regular highway speeds

        • anivia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, so far these cars have driven a lot of miles without crashes. They don’t need to be perfect, they just need to be better than a human driver, which is not a very high bar to set

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You are of course correct but the problem is that Tesla are irresponsible, shocking I know.

      All the other car companies are holding back their self-driving tech until it actually 100% works, but Tesla are like, nah we’re going to use our customers as bata testers. So what if they die they’ve already bought the car.

    • Mahonia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, the actual causes of pedestrian deaths (big dumb vehicles, infrastructure that more or less necessitates personal vehicle ownership) are the same things that the auto industry lobbies hard for.

  • Copythis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, I’d use partial self driving on I5 to eat my taco bell, but I’m still paying attention to what’s in front of me!

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m still paying attention to what’s in front of me

      Yeah, you’re paying attention to the fast food you’re too impatient to wait to eat safely. You’re not properly paying attention to the road or all of the other people whose lives are now in danger because you’re shoving a chalupa down your pie hole instead of safely operating the two ton missile you’re supposed to be guiding down the highway. Your lane assist isn’t magic, and when you inevitably fuck this up, I hope it’s a single-vehicle accident and you spare other drivers the misfortune.

      • Copythis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Jeez, It was a rental I had for a month about 2 years ago.

        And for your information, it was a single chicken taco. There were no cars around. I’m not talking LA I5, this is in the middle of nowhere and I had to make an emergency drive up Eureka from Sacramento.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah and what would you do if the device malfunctions or runs put of battery? You’d literally be blind.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, sure. You just “take it off” while driving a +2000kg metal block that’s circulating at 40 to 160km/h. It’s totally fine to lose control over your friggin eyes while operating a machine like that.

          I’m sorry but you’re either a troll or just very dumb.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’re not true AR devices, they’re VR headsets masquerading as AR, you’re still just watching a video of the world around you. As good as the Vision Pro’s passthrough video, it’s still passthrough video and doesn’t have the same resolution as our eyes would have, plus it probably blocks out at least some of your peripheral vision. I do think having a HUD while driving would be nice, but it would need to be able to restrict any sort of extraneous content out (like youtube videos or whatever) and ONLY show information needed for driving (maybe have music/audio controls at most).

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        the only “HUD” I want while driving is one that dynamically dims LED headlights while leaving the rest of my view unaltered.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The issue is the government’s biggest concern isn’t safety, it’s being able to legislate those being unsafe. Which can actually be conflicting, because even if a VR headset showing directions on the road itself is less distracting than looking at a separate phone/GPS- a cop doesn’t know if you’re doing that, or if you have YouTube in the corner of your eye.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh, you “could.” But I’ll bet you these individuals aren’t. These morons are looking at videos or scrolling the web or some other stupid attention diverting shit.

      I’m not sure there even exists any kind of hypothetical “AR driving assistance” app for the Apple Vision. And there probably never will, for the obvious massive liability reasons.

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Between this and the crApple VR thingy on the NYC subway, this makes me wonder for the fate of humanity.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      We embrance technology in stupid ways. It’s a thing we always do, It’s pretty hilarious aside from the death part.

      When cars were invented, there were no traffic laws, people drove drunk and got in tumbling car wrecks, ran over people constantly. They were much faster than foot, carriage, etc.

      When cell phones became affordable, people talked-and-drove so much and wrecks went up.

      When texting became popular, people texted and drove and wrecks went up even more.

      When smartphones became approachable to the masses, people drive around scrolling web sites rather than driving.

      When social video media became popular and usable on mobile broadband, people drive around watching videos rather than driving.

      Now VR headset, and on and on.

      I see a couple takeaways here:

      • We really hate driving, like a lot, at the expense of our own safety. Why doesn’t America especially embrace public transport. We have over a century of documented data indicating how much we all apparently hate driving so much we’ll try to die instead of driving.
      • We humans are really stupid about risk assessment, but eventually society corrects the stupidity. Seems to be something we just keep doing ad infinitum and we’re just cool losing a few people along the way until we correct. It’s just odd.