“…the average person treats a price ending in .99 as if it were 15 to 20 cents lower.”

The tendency is called left-digit bias, when the leftmost digit of a number disproportionately influences decision-making. In this case, even though the real difference is only a penny, research shows that, to the average person, $4.99 seems 15 to 20 cents cheaper than $5.00 – which results in selling 3 to 5 percent more units than at a price of $5.00"

Why Literally (Almost) Every Price Ends in 99 Cents

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_pricing

  • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Wouldn’t the cashier get more opportunities to swipe money every time they open the drawer? And how would they explain the drawer not adding up at the end of the shift?

    • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If it was say fruit, or beer in a bar, one isn’t counted that close bulk and the other, you could just wait till you sell six and then ring it through as a six pack to go.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the price was exactly $10 and the customer had exactly $10, the cashier didnt have to open the drawer at all. There is no record of any sale, the drawer doesnt have to add up because the money never went in and the only way to prove that they stole that $10 in their pocket is to catch them in the act.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        What, why tf wouldn’t the cashier have to open the drawer? Why wouldn’t they have to record the sale? They’d still have to account for the loss of inventory. Even if they did the 99 cent thing all a cashier would have to do is keep a pocket full of pennies to be able to do the exact same thing. None of that makes sense as an explanation.

        • sparkitz@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, it makes sense and seems plausible to me. With the speculated origin being the late 1800s when there were no cameras and no software system used for tracking inventory.