• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, they didn’t.

    Yes. They did.

    The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech.

    Yes, I got that. My point (once again) is no one thinks it is illegal, which makes the argument it a strawman (ie: arguing against a point no one is making).

    No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung

    Oh look, another strawman.

    Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.

    I’m really not sure what this is supposed to mean in this context. I didn’t “make it a thing”. It was “made a thing” by whoever decided to sing it, the people who were upset by it, the article that was published, and the person replying to the article.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, that’s definitely what’s happening. I need attention from anonymous strangers on the internet. 🤦‍♂️ It’s definitely not that someone had a bad take. Deny deny deny.

        • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, that’s definitely what’s happening. I need attention from anonymous strangers on the internet.

          ooh look, another strawman argument. strawman arguments all over the place today!