• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Is every terror attack for political reasons justified then?

    YES

    Who defines what terror is? What is politics? If the policies that govern a society aren’t working for a group, and they are given no other recourse, what are they to do? What justifies anything? Can you justify dropping a nuclear bomb on an unaware city to “end the war?” You can, but it erodes your moral authority to other groups.

    “right to kill everybody?”

    Not everybody. Violence should only be used if it is necessary to achieve goals. There is a reason Nelson Mandela refused to renounce violent struggle.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If you lived in a fascists society that was systematically killing gay and trans people, and you opposed this action, would it be justified for you to form a group and fight them?

        If the answer is yes, congratulations, you are a terrorist to the state.

        The question of whether a terror attack is justified becomes a moral question. The bigger issue is violence and politics. Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.

    • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      So a democracy has no value to you? Not everyone can be perfectly happy with the state of society at any point in time. What makes you feel like you are entitled to achieve your goals against the majority’s will?

      If the policies that govern a society aren’t working for a group, […] what are they to do?

      • Either you accept the constitution, in which case you could protest, say your opinion publicly or just accept what the majority wants, OR
      • You don’t accept the constitution, in which case you can leave the country/society.
      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re conflating a lot of empty signifiers with “democracy.” So, I’ll focus on the specifics of political activism.

        If you, and the political group you ideologically agree with lived in Nazi Germany, but were a minority, would it be morally justified to fight against the government with terrorism if you are unable to leave?

        Every political group thinks they are justified in their actions. One group’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter.

        • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I respect democratic decisions and find any form of terrorism against those decisions and thus the democratic system itself unjustifyable.

          [About Nazi Germany:] would it be morally justified to fight against the government with terrorism if you are unable to leave?

          The Nazis didn’t adhere to the democratic principles themselves, they were very much antidemocratic and were forcibly trying to change the system against the will of the majority (this I find unjustifyable). They were themselves a kind of minority

          To answer your question, I think I would be justified to fight that (with force), HOWEVER, it is NOT justified that I push my own minority-opinion (e.g. by establishing a dictstorship with me as the dictator).