You seem to agree that they do imply other benefits outside of just not using artificial fertilizers. This would mean that pointing out that these implied benefit don’t actually exist is not really a strawman. It’s like saying Trump didn’t try to pressure the GA official to overturn the outcome of the election because he never explicitly said it, he just implied it, so pointing out his criminal behavior here is a “straw man.”
You seem to agree that they do imply other benefits outside of just not using artificial fertilizers. This would mean that pointing out that these implied benefit don’t actually exist is not really a strawman. It’s like saying Trump didn’t try to pressure the GA official to overturn the outcome of the election because he never explicitly said it, he just implied it, so pointing out his criminal behavior here is a “straw man.”
That’s more or less the opposite of what I said.