Yea, there is. We called it WW2.
Don’t start shit and there won’t be shit. That part is unbiased.
Yes reality is very biased against White Supremacists and their political cronies.
Why isn’t that judge ?
So the charges, crimes, evidence, jury, and conviction don’t matter. It’s all overturned because bOtH sIdEs nonsense. Hey judge I have an idea, if other people commit crimes then prosecute them. I wonder if he’s close to realizing the why.
I’m starting to understand better and better how countries fall into fascism. It’s unreal.
I’m starting to understand better and better how countries fall into strongmen and fascism.
When only one side is willing to engage in violence, that is the side that will win. Every time.
I’m not necessarily saying there should be a violent far left committing crimes. . . but the right keep trying to both-sides their terrorism shit, that’s how you get a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Rundo was accused not just of organizing the violent confrontations, but also of attacking protesters and police officers. After Rundo was ordered by police to stop attacking a “defenseless person” during the Berkeley protest, he allegedly punched an officer twice in the head, according to an arrest warrant.
I have a feeling if someone with “far left” beliefs showed up in his courtroom with the same charges, he wouldn’t hesitate to throw the book at them. This decision seems ripe for overturning on appeal, since he literally says in his decision “there’s no doubt they committed these violent acts.”
What? Are you telling me eco terrorists who did this would never see the light of day again? Or that communists who assault cops die?
Yeah the left knows we don’t get the kiddie gloves. When we fight we know the risks
I like how you put “far left” in quotes. Because I’m not far left but I am “far left”.
Yeah I’m not even really sure what constitutes “far left” in the American political spectrum. Like, I do believe food should be a right, but that’s along the lines of “no one deserves to starve if we produce more food than we need” and that doesn’t feel radical to me.
Right? I don’t think a clump of cells should be prioritized over a woman’s mental or physical well-being. Apparently I may as well have a hammer in one hand, a sickle in the other, and be out in the streets mowing down small business owners.
Prosecutorial discretion seems like a valid explanation
There seems to be little doubt that Defendants, or at least some members of RAM, engaged in criminal violence. But they cannot be selected for prosecution because of their repugnant speech and beliefs over those who committed the same violence with the goal of disrupting political events
That’s actually part of the judge’s decision. “These people are guilty, but since you didn’t prosecute those other people, too bad.”
Not allowed to punish white folks until you punish just as many minorities. (Think about that math…)
Nobody bring up the BLM arrests during the protests…
Or the Cop City arrests and prosecutions that have been going on more recently
Or the Dakota Access Pipeline protests from a while ago
Or [etc.]
I’m certain other judges will be stoked to see people cite this in future cases. “You can’t punish me because other people did similar things and aren’t part of this trial. Here’s an earlier case where the court has decided that way.”
I’ve brought this up before but I’ll say it again: I have never met a member of a group of violent and organized far left extremists, or anyone who identifies as Antifa, to the point that I have trouble believing they exist. I’ve met some far left wackos, but none claiming to be organized or in cahoots with other far left wackos, and most of their violence was in speech only.
But I’ve met way too many far right knuckleheads who’d be all too happy to shoot someone.
Similarly, the only time you would hear someone described as ‘woke’ just a few years ago is if one black person talked about another black person about being aware of racial injustice.
And then there was “social justice warrior,” which, like antifa, is not actually a thing. But if it was, the #1 candidate would be their hero Jesus.
I’ve met a couple SJWs that were unhinged, but they weren’t really violent and certainly not an organized terror group the the fucking Proud Boys
I’ve met a couple SJWs that were unhinged
No you haven’t, because “SJW” isn’t a thing. It’s an insult. And a stupid one.
And you clearly don’t remember 2016. There were quite a few people parading around and correcting people’s speech, which kinda led to this whole woke and anti woke stuff.
2016? It has been an insult since 2011 and Gamergate.
Before that it was a very rarely-used term that was occasionally positive but usually neutral.
It’s not a thing.
Ah yes. It was the people asking that maybe people should be more consciencous and to not be openly terrible who are to blame for it all…
Not the entitled asshats who puffed up their chests and screamed “You can’t tell me what to do!” when someone told them "You’re being kinda hurtful could you please stop? "
Here’s the thing when your life sucks because people are being regularly being awful. Not mentioning anything and being quiet and meek and accepting of other people basically being a regular impingment on your ability to flourish or be comfortable doesn’t change your circumstances. They are just gunna keep being awful and draining your batteries. Also those people flipped the fuck out over “hey maybe the way women are depicted in videogames is kind of male centric and kind of shit if you aren’t a guy” and in response went on a terror campaign to literally ruin the lives of those who decided to mention that maybe they were dreaming of a better situation. That little over-reaction was not proportionate in scope.
Fighting for empathy is a hard business. The “anti-woke” can never truly win as what they seek to suppress will always be there. They must always exert force because that dissatisfaction and misery that underlies the asks won’t go away… it can be silenced, rendered mute by fear and consequences of retaliation and stifled for another generation but the cost is that the boot must always be forced down because it’s never quite able to eliminate that final resistance of people coming into existance who realize they aren’t who society is built for and who have no option but to suffer. The people beneath the boot might be weakened temporarily as the fight ebbs and flows but the harder the boot comes down the deeper the dispair the more desperate the resistance.
Just the implications that people are unhappy does not sit well with the anti-woke crowd. They resent the idea that people’s unhappiness is directly caused by them which rubs uncomfortably against their idea of the world as an ultimately fair place. Hence why they always argue that people are lying and exaggerating their discomfort. That the facts are wrong, that the people they are causing pain to deserve it somehow. It’s all just lame dodges around the central issue. They are causing discomfort. They can choose to double down and cause more, ignore it or rationalize it or choose to believe that they as the truest form of being knows what’s best for the people experiencing it- indeed better than the people who live that experience … But they cannot end it.
The notion that what they are being asked to do won’t individually impact them very much is something that they scoff at and then just ignore spaces where these adaptations have been successful. The landscape of gaming became a little more equitable after gamergate because some developers basically just realized that yeah, maybe they were undercutting women and changing formulas a little does kind of expand their market? Gamergate threw their tantrum but most of them barely registered that gaming still continued to service their needs while expanding it’s service to others but because they were on to throwing a tantrum about something else they never really registered that what changed was… fine actually?
Removed by mod
Do please provide evidence that antifa exists.
Removed by mod
Which Antifa chapter is she a member of? Who is the leader of that chapter? Do they have a website? If not, how do you join?
Interesting that the article you pasted explains none of that, yet insists antifa is real based on “this person says they’re antifa.”
So can you answer those questions? If not- how is it a real thing?
Antifa is a movement without centralized control. There are no chapters, website, or membership. That is core to the movement, so questioning why no one can provide that information is really silly.
I also have never met a member of Antifa, but there is enough evidence of their actions to make me certain the movement exists. Some people believe it exists, but as a false-flag movement, but I think that’s just conspiratorial thinking.
Using, “I’ve never seen one,” as evidence is the kind of BS Jan6 insurrections use to say the election was stolen.
“I don’t believe it’s warranted that Mr. Rundo spend one minute more in custody, so I’m going to release him forthwith,” Carney said. “I feel very comfortable in the decision I’ve made.”
Of course he feels comfortable with that. He’s one of the white supremacists.
He’s a white hooded judge. Of course he’s comfortable.
Rundo was accused not just of organizing the violent confrontations, but also of attacking protesters and police officers. After Rundo was ordered by police to stop attacking a “defenseless person” during the Berkeley protest, he allegedly punched an officer twice in the head, according to an arrest warrant.
I’d be willing to bet that the majority of this judge’s supporters have Thin Blue Line bumper stickers and still support this decision.
And that’s right after the part where he equates Trump supporters with Nazis.
“Arrest the President of Antifa immediately for unauthorized libbing.”
US District Judge and White Supremacist Cormac J Carney
That’s future Republican Supreme Court nominee white supremacist Cormac J Carney to you bub.
Nah, he’s already 64 years old. Unfortunately, the current game is nominate Justices who can hold on to their seats for decades and decades.
Sounds like the prosecutors simply need to prosecute crimes equally and this ceases to be an issue.
They are, this judge is just making shit up to justify letting his fellow Nazis get away with their political violence
Clearly not as the defendants literally demonstrated in court there is a political bias in who is prosecuted.
There’s political bias to charge criminals with crime?
It’s unequal in that they’re already more likely to prosecute minorities. Somehow I doubt prosecution of more white people would have changed this judge’s mind.
If an individual commits one crime, prosecute them. If a different individual commits seven crimes, prosecute them seven times. That is equal treatment. Scale up to any political or racial group and that is the model that is to be followed.
In this case, certain political groups get prosecuted at lower rates due to their politics. That is a problem that will continue, and people will continue to go free, unless prosecutors treat groups equally regardless of their politics, race, sex, etc.
Since when does the group you belong to matter in court?
I thought we’re all the same in the eyes of the law.
Since when does the group you belong to matter in court?
I thought we’re all the same in the eyes of the law.
Not sure since when it started, but the defendants were able to demonstrate we aren’t. Which is something that needs fixing ASAP.
Did they demonstrate it? I don’t see any evidence of that.
Before the Internet, I knew there were dumb fucks in this world. I could just never, ever imagine how many of them there are.
Thanks to the Internet, now I know.
They know exactly what they’re doing.
There seems to be little doubt that Defendants, or at least some members of RAM, engaged in criminal violence.
If an individual commits one crime, prosecute them.
So, he should be prosecuted right?
bias against the far right
They say that like it’s a bad thing, I’m all for a bias against fascism
There’s more about this asshole judge’s college football career than his legal career in his Wikipedia:
Whatabout is now a criminal defense, if you are a white supremacist.
white supremacy codified in precedent. faaaaaaantaastic.
fucking conservatives assholes.
Conserving a racial hierarchy, it was right there in the name the whole time.
Which order do people think the laws are there to protect? Anyone shouting about law and order should bring a chill to your spine. Nothing good will come of it. Conservatives shouting about law and order… It’s passed time to grab and use your weapons against them.
FYI: It’s “past time”. But I’ll admit, I wasn’t 100% sure, myself, so I had to double check before responding. https://grammarpartyblog.com/2012/01/20/pass-time-versus-pastime/
You are correct. I should have checked the speech to text better.
“Would somebody please think of the white supremacists!” /s
Fuck this judge.
“The state is prosecuting murderers instead of jaywalkers, better let the murderers go!”
The Good - White-supremacist who had to be chased to Romania after fleeing, will go back in jail (if caught), after an emergency appeal from the state
The Bad - A District Judge released an all-but-convicted violent Nazi, citing checks notes “both sides”, and SET NO CONDITIONS FOR THAT RELEASE, despite the prosecution’s protests and his proven track record of running from the law:
“Due to the district court’s order, Rundo will be released imminently, at which point he will be under no bond conditions or travel restraints,” according to the motion by Assistant U.S. Attorney Bram Alden, who is chief of the Los Angeles office’s Criminal Appeals Section.
What are the remedies here?
-removed-
