With, out, fail…

Also anyone got a new job available?

  • DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Of course, because if you don’t do this, then you inevitably hear the second movement: 🎶 if you’re trying to share your screen, we can’t see your screen 🎶 (sightly pissy-mo)

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s missing the awkward pause where nobody can speak for “everyone”, so everyone is silent.

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I hate it so much. I always say “I just assume you all see my screen. As you can see…”. Screen sharing works in what? 99% of cases? We do not need to ask if everyone can see my screen and let 1-10 people answer that stupid question every time. The modus operandi is that this software works in the vast majority of cases and the recipients just need to know that I started sharing my screen and that it will in 99% of cases work just fine. Let them speak up for the 1% of times where it does not work.

    I am also a big fan of ending my emails with “A response is not needed”. Stop sending me replies with those stupid one line emails “Thank you so much for sending me what I asked you for… bla bla”. Not every emails needs a response.

    • Jako301@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Screen sharing works in what? 99% of cases?

      It works 95% of the time but it often takes 10+ seconds until everyone can see the screen.

      I get your point, but teams is such a broken mess that I think the question is legitimate. Half the time it doesn’t even register my microphone even if Windows doesn’t have a problem with it.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Honestly, Teams works pretty much flawlessly for me. It’s a resource hog and some actions (like switching between tabs) are inexcusably slow, but it works pretty well 99% of the time.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe it’s because I have a pretty beefy work laptop but I rarely have issues with Teams. I dread Zoom calls, though. The video quality seems worse and whatever noise reduction Teams has doesn’t seem to exist on Zoom so it sounds bad, too. Not to mention the ugly interface

          That said I’ll take Zoom over webex any day. Thankfully Cisco is the only company I work with who uses it… And we make them use Teams when we host there meeting

          • Kallioapina@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s funny, I’ve very recently had pretty much the opposite experiences with the Teams/Zoom reliability.

            I had and interview project, and and in about 50% (around 15 out of 29-31, something like that) of the cases Teams calls failed pretty much in the beginning due to some technical problem, almost always the problems coming from the other end, on 1 case something unexplainably went to shit on my end (suddenly no sound or video), and I think of my self being pretty tech savvy on the user side. We had to fall back to phone calls for those “It’s just Teams, no problems, I understand” cases.

            In the Zoom calls, 5/5 worked without issues.

            Wonder why this is such recurring issue. I mean, havent Microsoft poured hundreds of millions of euro/dollars into the app/infrastructure? Where is the money going?

        • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Wait, what? I thought they killed Teams for Linux a few years back. I’ve been piping my Webcam to a Windows VM just so I can run Teams and Outlook.

            • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Ooh, that’s a good suggestion to try, too! My specific problem with teams in the browser is the feedback cancelation bits. When I am unmuted, the people I’m chatting with hear themselves echoed. Using the full teams app in a windows VM with my webcam piped to the windows VM works fine. I’ll try the AUR teams first, but if that doesn’t work I’ll look into waydroid, too. Thanks!

        • Jako301@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s the exact opposite of what I’ve read in most linux threads on here. Most people seem to complain about teams not working at all under Linux.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The length of the notes is proportional to how bad the UX is to get it going.

  • lugal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You forgot the intro: Hello, hello, hello, can everybody hear me? Is everybody there?

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      And the borg hivemind imitation when everyone has to greet everyone joining and 200 people keep saying hello in a way too happy manner for 5min.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s like a Digital Seance.

      Tom, Are you with us?

      Can you hear us Tom?

      Make a sound if you can hear us.

      We can’t see you. Can you hear us?

      Is anyone with us right now?

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Steven?

      Yes?

      This is Clem Fandango.

      I know who you are.

      Can you hear me?

      YES I CAN HEAR YOU CLEM FANDANGO

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In this day and age, surely someone can put this into a website and play the melody?

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s an important lesson from the early days of the pandemic: assume you’ll get zero reaction from the group, so set up your questions/requests/etc. in such a way that a non-response gives you the answer you want.

      “Okay I’m getting ready to start here, speak up if you can’t see my screen.”

      “I’m setting our target completion date for next Thursday. Anyone have any issues meeting that deadline?”

      “This new wrinkle seems like something that is mostly within the area of expertise of Bob’s team, so I’m going to ask that they resolve it before our next meeting. Bob, do you have any issues with adding that to your list?”

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Only thing I do differently is throw that “Bob” at the start of the phrase instead of the end. Hearing your name triggers your brain to focus, so start with "Bob, let me know if you have an issue with this… Since XYZ is in your team’s area of expertise I’m asking that you resolve it by… "

        Saves a lot of time and embarrassment on the “sorry, I was multitasking, can you repeat that?”