• Turun@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fuck cars, but was it really necessary to compare at such different speeds? Air resistance is a big factor and a proper electric bike can go 45kmh as well. Or the car can drive 25kmh

    • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      a proper electric bike can go 45kmh as well.

      There’s some debate about that. E-bicycles above level 2 (with assistance at over 20km/h) are not allowed on a lot of bike lanes, so they’re more like electric motorcycles

      • biddy@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It depends where you live. Here the limit is 400W. Which is probably not quite enough to hit 45km/h in ideal flat conditions.

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The fact remains that cars are faster than bikes. Driving a car usually means going faster and hence wasting more energy. Sure, plenty of people deal with distances that necessitate such speeds to be practical in daily life, but that’s a different problem to be solved.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I agree.

        But if it’s a different problem to be solved the comparison is useless from the get go.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The different speeds are to make sure the graph pushes the agenda of the creator. All of them going the same speed would decrease the disparity between walking and driving.

      You got lies, damn lies and statistics.

      And this is one of those.