• NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It wasn’t a comment about alternatives, it was a comment about something also being wildly expensive and over budget.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the general feeling from people in allied countries that have been put on the F-35 program.

      Other fighters could have been a better match, instead they got the expensive Letherman.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Which fighter is a better match than an F-35 if you want stealth? (If you don’t want stealth, you aren’t looking at a F-35) The A model is damn nice for most, and the B model wipes the floor with the VTOL competition. There is damn good reason over 1,000 of these have been produced already and orders keep coming in.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t doubt that F-35 has some good stats, I am looking at this from a more general perspective, what I have seen is that because F-35 costs substantially more than other fighters this limits countries that does not have a US level defense budget on how many planes they can afford, for example instead of 50 F-16 they end up with 10-20 F-35.

          And by looking at those numbers it seems like they get less defense for the same amount even if F-35 is better than the alternatives.