lending purpose to an evolutionary trait is a mistake. It is possibly that mechanism by which they attained some degree of success, but evolution doesn’t ‘think’ unless youre into predeterminism like that.
Totally. Perhaps a better way to learn it would be, the successful result of the adaptation was that birds spread their seeds instead of mammals. Until us.
lending purpose to an evolutionary trait is a mistake. It is possibly that mechanism by which they attained some degree of success, but evolution doesn’t ‘think’ unless youre into predeterminism like that.
Totally. Perhaps a better way to learn it would be, the successful result of the adaptation was that birds spread their seeds instead of mammals. Until us.
the correct response to mine may be ‘why crabs then?’ to which i have no response xD
deleted by creator