From: https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f87d7e2b-d3ea-401c-944d-887568035ac3.webp
scarecrowbar.com /r/scarecrowbar FB/X/IG @scarecrowbar
From: https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f87d7e2b-d3ea-401c-944d-887568035ac3.webp
scarecrowbar.com /r/scarecrowbar FB/X/IG @scarecrowbar
What tax breaks?
Company receives $1 donation. Company donates $1 to charity. Company writes $1 off of their income for the year.
It comes out net-zero, this is a stupid thing for people to get upset about.
Yeah, my question was more rhetorical. There is no tax break really, they don’t pay tax on the donation because it’s not income
However, a not stupid thing for people to get upset about is what CVS did a couple years ago. Basically, they pledged to donate $10M to a charity, then collected donations from customers, and put those donations towards that pre-existing pledge.
To illustrate why this is shitty (in the event that someone misses the point):
CVS pledged to donate $10M. Effectively from that point, they were giving the charity $10M regardless of what else happened. At that moment, CVS was spending $10M and the charity was gaining $10M. CVS then asked for donations from customers, stating that the donations would be going towards that charity.
If they collected (for example) $1M in donations, they would cover the remaining $9M, so the charity gets their $10M, so what’s the problem?
The problem is that the customers weren’t donating to the charity; they were donating to CVS. In the end, the charity didn’t get any more money than they would have without those customers’ donations; CVS paid less, instead.
Kind of. They’re still claiming a PR thing, but that’s probably worth looking past to benefit the charity.
They’re absolutely not getting any kind of tax break from these.