Biting freeze peach commentary! So deep!
Now here’s a question… / scatterbrained thinking
In that priest arrested community on here, Catholics get shit on for pedophilia all the time. Speaking truth to power probably, defending kids.
And for sure this other comic the extremist made is real dicey (NSFW).
How do I square that (the stupidity of caring about the tunnel stuff) with the fact Metzitzah B’peh is just… whatever, I won’t tell you what to think about it. Factually, it’s controversial. Does it make sense to meme something you don’t like if it’s pro-kid but offensive to a marginalized group?
Source, which also talks about acceptance & rejection of using a glass tube so you don’t have to put your mouth on a baby’s bleeding penis.
Concise question: could an egalitarian draw a comic calling out Metzitzah B’peh as wrong without the comic being antisemitic?
Seeking comments from people who aren’t brain dead (aren’t antisemitic). (sry 2 many unclear words)
100%. Dude eats crayons.
IIRC, saying truly abhorrent things is legal, thus even hate speech is free speech.
Would the comic be accurate if it labeled both flag burnings as free speech, and then also labeled only the pride flag burning as hate speech?
Edit - hmm I think country of origin is a protected class… It would be interesting if America considered anti-American speech as hate speech, but conceivable
In Canada we have actual hate speech laws, but even here burning a pride flag doesn’t count. You’d have to be publishing things that say something like “death to gay people”.