Fast-food chain Chick-fil-A has sparked a social media backlash after announcing that it will soon allow certain antibiotics in the chickens it raises, citing supply issues.

Chick-fil-A restaurants in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico will transition “from chicken raised with No Antibiotics Ever (NAE) to chicken raised with No Antibiotics Important to Human Medicine (NAIHM), starting in the spring of 2024,” the company said in a statement posted on its website this week.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m thinking that this homophonic fast food restaurant does not warrant the amount of comments in this thread. Yes I am aware of the irony of my commenting.

  • TK420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I bet god spoke to the CEO one night as a burning sack of cash and said this was a great idea.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I bought a sandwich for them when I read that they stopped doing all that stuff, of course they quitely started up again.

        You really aren’t missing much. It is marginally better quality compared to any chain and lower quality than a real restaurant.

          • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Entirely depends on when you go. At peak hours they’re frying chicken and packing sandwiches in advance, which means the unbreathable pouch they wrap and close off the sandwiches in cause the chicken to get VERY soggy if they aren’t sold quickly.

          • bitchkat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I said yes. I’m not sure what is so hard to understand. The food there is horrible. It OK if you think its not that bad.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I mean, I don’t believe you. Their chicken is known to be good. Not just my opinion. Saying otherwise puts you in the small minority, and I think you’re only saying it because you hate their politics.

              • bitchkat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’ve heard they were good and tried it a couple of times. It was the worst fast food I’ve ever had. The worst was some little cafe in WInnepeg where they gave me fried eggs instead of scrambled. When I asked for scrambled, they took it in back and chopped up the fried egg, and cooked it a little more. That does not make scrambled eggs.

              • frunch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                No evidence hits quite as hard as ‘people are saying it’ 🙄 totally disproves the soggy chicken comments people are also saying ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                You can’t debate someone into liking a shitty product

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m not debating, I’m calling them a liar

                  I am also laughing at this weird gen Z trend of having to pretend that if a company’s practices are horrible, their product must be horrible. “Starbucks coffee sucks” lol my dude, if you don’t like caramel flavored ice cream with whipped cream on top with a shot of espresso blended in, that is a you problem.

                  Or like every time there’s a vegan thread “yeah burgers are gross anyway” uh huh sure.

                  I think you’re all lying in an attempt to fit in.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The chicken has always been moist-soggy. This was fine when everyone else had dry as fuck chicken. Now everyone else has figured out the moist-crispy sandwich and CFA just isn’t that great.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just tell your customers you upped the Jesus in every sandwich and they’ll overlook everything else.

  • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “citing supply issues.”

    When a business “cites” anything, they really mean “we think we can make more money doing this.”

    What’ll be funny about this is when they look at it having no impact on sales, so they just keep it.

    • FoolishObserver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      “citing suppy issues”

      Hmm… our supply of cash would be bigger if we cut corners over here. The thought of the potentially bigger cash pile is now bothersome to me.

    • eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are facing a genuine supply issue. A different company made a sudden move because they wanted to maximize profits.

      Tyson, one of the main chicken processors, killed their no-antibiotics program at the end of 2023. They moved from claiming meat came from chickens that had had no antibiotics used (NAE) to claiming no human-relevant antibiotics had been used (NAIHM).

      The rest of the market can’t meet the demand for NAE, at least not in the short term.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “In a statement to Reuters, Chick-fil-A said the policy change was due to challenges it foresees finding chicken supplies that “meets our rigid standards.””

    So, clearly, the solution is “lower your standards”? 🤔

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think that’s the trick though, they aren’t “their” chickens. They’re buying them from 3rd party vendors.

        If they wanted to be serious about quality, they’d set their own standards and raise their own chickens.

        • fishpen0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The in-n-out system. Most of their meat comes from their own farms and processing facilities.

          This is also why they’ve expanded incredibly slowly compared to most fast food chains

    • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, consumers are proud to lower their standards all the time.

      I don’t see why this would be any different.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, lowering standards is a pretty common solution. A friend of mine who was a firefighter said they wanted more female firefighters - so they lowered test standards so they were able to pass.

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is completely off topic, but here’s some facts for you, from someone who works at a fire department.

        Those physical fitness tests were pretty arbitrary. They don’t have much basis in the job itself.
        At most departments, physical fitness tests are for the application only, and a LARGE percentage of current firefighters couldn’t pass them just a few years later.
        There are many, many jobs a firefighter does, and most of them do not require massive amounts of physical strength.
        Firefighters deal with the public, and often in a medical capacity far more often than an extinguishing fire capacity. Having female paramedics available to run medical calls is very important for the community. This is the same for having a mix of employees from all socioeconomic groups that are in the area.
        There are a LOT of fire departments that are switching to a more fair entrance criteria, and that is making the job better, not worse.

        • thantik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I know you’ve just kind of had a knee jerk reaction here, but I don’t think women should be restricted from that field ya know…I’m perfectly okay with it.

          • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            People will die because of it, but hey…women firefighters! WOO HOO!

            You clearly don’t think that.

            • thantik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I literally just told you what I think, and nobody could know that better than me, but…sure.

              If you can’t tell though – I was clearly being facetious.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not sure if you’re a sexist asshole or referring to tests that were originally made to be sexist/racist to only prefer a specific type of person, like the Jim Crow Literary tests that were purposely difficult and confusing to stop black folks from voting.

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Evaluations for firefighters have physical requirements. It is a physical job, men and women do tend to have different biological characteristics.

        • thantik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          They were test to assure safety of human life, and women couldn’t pass them. So they lowered them. The biggest one was being able to carry a person of a specific mass out of an area within a specific amount of time, with all your gear on, in a smoke filled room. Few men were able to pass it, and almost no women. So they lowered the amount of weight and upped the time limit. Sometimes even just flubbed the women passing so they could reach diversity goals.

          People will die because of it, but hey…women firefighters! WOO HOO!

          Now the thing that’s really sexist, is denying sexual dimorphism exists within the human species.

          • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Women firefighters are currently fighting wildfires in my state and actively saving lives. Get fucked, chauvinist

            • thantik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s great! I never said I had a problem with that. For the women who can legitimately pass the test, that’s wonderful!

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If the other choice is make less money then it’s obvious what corporations will do

      • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        are you regularly tasting homophobes to the point where you feel qualified to make that statement?

      • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        if you’ve bought anything there then you are contributing directly to people who fund and support the anti-lgbtq+ movement so yes, you cannot be a customer there and also support these social movements

        • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          While I agree with the stance that Chick-fil-a should be boycotted, I think declaring those who dont incapable of supporting lgbtq+ social movements only hurts said movements. Its not a zero sum game, and alienating potential allies is a losing strategy.

          Plus, at least as an American, its damn near impossible to survive without spending money on products that caused harm somewhere along the line. Dont be so quick to throw stones, all our hands are soaked with blood, most of us are just too busy to notice.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ironically enough, they hire shit tons of LGTBQ+ people in my area and the LGBTQ+ crowd fucking stans them.

    • scottywh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It won’t be noticeable.

      They only started doing “no antibiotics ever” in 2019 so this is basically only reverting back a change they just made a few years ago.

  • ytsedude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is a good move. It keeps the chickens healthier, which is good for them, the people who raise them, and the supply chain who depend on them.

    • hypnotoad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, totally, just giving chickens the free range space to live healthily in the first place is definitely the inferior choice. You nailed it.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe they should try making it good.

    Soggy salty chicken sandwich was fine in 2003 when everyone else was doing dry chicken sandwich. Now the meta is crunchy and juicy chicken sandwich so CFA is just mid.