https://lemmy.ml/post/13864821

I’d understand if they were a random user, but a mod should already have at least some understanding about a community’s topic.

But worse to me are their comments in that post calling the people responding “childish trolls in this community”. I do not think that this is appropriate for a moderator.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Opensource just means that the source code is available, FOSS however implies that you’re free to modify and redistribute the program

    Incorrect. “Open Source” also means that you are free to modify and redistribute the software.

    If the source code is merely available but not free to modify and/or redistribute, then it is called source-available software.

    • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Incorrect. “Open Source” also means that you are free to modify and redistribute the software.

      Not necessarily true - that right to modify/redistribute depends on the exact license being applied. For example, the Open Watcom Public License claims to be an “open source” license, but it actually doesn’t allow making modifications. This is also why we specifically have the terms “free software” or “FOSS” which imply they you are indeed allowed to modify and redistribute.

      I would recommend reading this: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html