• ickplant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mine will likely never be eliminated unless it all goes away because I make too much, and that’s totally fine by me. I want as many people to get relief as possible! Public colleges and universities should be free, and student debt should not be a thing. At least not the way it is now.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think it’s really worth noting that in the end, the most egregious abuse is the usury. Having to pay multiple values of the principle is the trap most people fall into.

        Hey, Y’all Qaeda. Why aren’t you focused on that sin against Gaaaaaaawd?

        • Osito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Interest on student loans is crazy to begin with

          If I go to college and get a better job, then the country is already benefitting from a larger tax base from me having a better job than I would otherwise.

          So not only am I getting taxed on a larger tax base, but I’m also paying interest on a loan to get the better job lol

          I’m getting hit twice

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You deserve relief too. Maybe not all of it but just because you’re one of the lucky few that won the job lottery. Still, everyone deserves an education, especially those who will use it to their full advantage.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Another guy who won the job lottery here. I agree that in principle we deserve relief, but we should be at the absolute back of the line. We may deserve it, but we don’t need it. A lot of people need it. Those tax dollars are better spent on the less fortunate.

        • GhostFence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, with that relief he could buy more stuff and help keep employment high, or invest his money in an ethical business to spur more job growth… which is more likely if that poster walks the talk. Regardless, college debt is just economic parasitism.

    • Doxatek@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I feel happy when someone in this position can say this instead of the ol’ “I did it so you should suffer too” to type logic haha

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I definitely sympathize with people in college debt, but this feels like just temporary wins and doesn’t address the real problems. This won’t solve the overpriced cost of education. Forgive debt now, a new crop of students will just go into debt next, right?

    We need universities to be completely free, universal single payer health care, drastically cheaper housing to rent and own, etc.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      When someone is having a heart attack you don’t give them a lecture on the importance of diet and exercise.

      There is a problem now, solve it. Fix the root cause next.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why do you want free universities for degrees that actually give a net benefit?

      And the reason housing is so expensive is directly due to government intervention in housing.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s 100 percent, certified bullshit.

        Government could fix housing SUPER fast. Tax rental payments on single-family homes at 100% to make SFR build-to-rent impossible.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I work in municipal development.

            100% of new single-family developments approaching the city over the last 2 years have been for build-to-rent exclusively. The existing SFR homes are being bought up at massively inflated prices to convert them into rentals.

            The only reliable way to buy a home for your family to live in within 50 miles of the city is to buy empty land and have a custom million+ dollar house built, because the existing inventory is being grabbed up by rental investors and new inventory isn’t even being made available for sale.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sure, in short housing is too difficult and too expensive to build to keep up with demand. All this is due to government requirements on housing which adds over $100k on average per single family house, as well as it just being a general headeache. And this doesnt even get into the currency manipulation issue.

          • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            What requirements though?

            And the government doesn’t control monetary policy, so can you expand on that too?

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              There are probably 1000 different requirements for each small town and then add the state and national ones to that. The requirements will be things like getting an engineering report if you remove more than 10 yards of dirt, or add a roof element that makes the house look good.

              The government does control the supply of money via the Federal Reserve. If you are interested I can tell you how it directly makes the rich richer and takes the wealth of the middle class and poor.

              • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                The fed is independent. If you’d like, I can give you a primer on how that works

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Let me get this straight, the US controls and funds all kinds of governments around the world but they wouldnt control the fed? “But its a private company!!!” Sure it is, its totally not completely controlled by the government…

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                waaaaaaa regulation makes stuff more expensive to do, get rid of it so we can make money at the expense of the ppooooooooorrrrrrssss

                Classic conservative

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        because I’m not a piece of shit and want to see my fellow Americans do better. a rising tide lifts all boats.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Wow TIL all degrees are useless.

            What’d you get your degree in? Maybe you got a useless one.

              • GhostFence@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Dude you must think they get their degrees in feminist dance or some boogeyman degree. News flash you want some people to get good jobs with that “useless” feminist dance degree. Because if not, they’re going to crowd into degrees like engineering and greater numbers of engineering grads creates greater competition for engineering jobs… which drives down the pay that most engineers get, plus it reduces the odds of actually getting a starter engineering job. Supply & demand.

                Signed, 100% NOT a feminist.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The market pretty much tells us what are useful and useless degrees. The issue with your theory is that people do crowd into engineering and then the joke is after they fail they do business.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why do you want free universities for degrees that actually give a net benefit?

        It is in your sentence. I want things that offer a net benefit. That’s why I like fire departments for example. We all benefit from not having uncontrolled fire about.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        And the reason housing is so expensive is directly due to government intervention in housing.

        Fuck off you conservative dipshit, try your incredibly wrong talking points somewhere people aren’t gonna see right through it

        • GhostFence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yup! Housing investors >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zoning laws or all the other narratives about government interference.

        • constantturtleaction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          While it is certainly not the only reason, government intervention via zoning laws is definitely a factor in the house crisis. If mixed use zoning was more universally a thing, then that would be the government not intervening in the housing market.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s even more so due to the ultra-low interest rates that were the “temporary” “solution” to the post 2008 crash recession (only they weren’t all that temporary and didn’t really solve the problem, more pushed it along).

            There is a lot of info out there about how such monetary policy pushed money up the yield-scale out of Treasuries and Bonds and into things like Stocks and Realestate.

            Another point is the wealth concentration we’re seeing: as a bigger and bigger fraction of GDP ends up in the hands of the already very wealthy the fraction of GDP that’s seeking investment opportunities (rather than being spent: poorer people spend all or most of their income, whilst rich people spend but a tiny fraction and the rest they invest) exploded and all that has to go somewhere and Realestate is perceived as safe (especially if governments will do all they can to not let prices fall) and has a lot more yield than treasuries.

            This shit goes all the way back to Obama, and was just as much pushed by Republicans as by Democracts.

            • GhostFence@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Oh please. None of that even PALES in comparison to the outright supply crunch being caused by housing investors. It doesn’t even compare to the damage being done by the rampant construction of expensive luxury/multifamily homes.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                It explains why there are so many house investors now when there were way less about a decade or so ago.

                It also explains the record-setting stockmarket valuations even though most people feel things have gone backwards.

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree but that would require Congress to do something. Trying to accomplish this through executive actions alone might not actually work, but it at least shows voters clearly which party is willing to take action on this issue, and hopefully we will end up with a Congress that is more in line with the will of the people.

      • Dragster39@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think this might be my key takeaway. He is wiling to address exactly this problem and might continue in the future. Even if you don’t benefit from it, it shows a clear path he is willing to take.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        He’s doing more than he really can, but I also feel this is his way of communicating that he is in fact trying. SCOTUS and the Department of Education has both said it is not within his power, and whether or not I agree, the SCOTUS will likely continue to prevent him from pushing this through.

        Realistically our government should be doing much more in aiding people through higher education, but at this point it’s like threading a needle.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh, just in time for another election…gee, what a coincidence.

    And, if by some miracle, he doesn’t lose to Trump, he’ll be just fine and dandy when some “administrative/process complication” blocks it, just like last time.

    • drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You must have missed it. When he tried the first time, the Supreme Court stopped him. It wasn’t a conspiracy by Biden’s administration. And since then his administration has been successfully canceling student loan debt for certain subsections of the population.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That darn court, jeepers. If only Democrats had other levers of power at their disposal…gosh, just bad luck that they’re always able to help out their donors, but just can’t push through major legislation for the rest of us…

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You mean the levers of power he’s currently using? But I guess fuck Biden for doing exactly what your asking for. I swear like half this country has poo brains, and I’m not just talking about Republicans.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          You clearly have no understanding of how the American political system works, and have not actually followed any actual domestic events.

          I’m terrified that you have a right to vote. You’re an idiot. Please go buy a gram of weed and bring it to your nearest police officer so you may be arrested and have your right to vote revoked. You do not deserve it.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’ve probably worked on more campaigns than you’ve had election cycles. Both paid, and as a volunteer.

            I’m not in the habit of sharing too many personal details online, but I will say that my background in statewide and national politics, specifically Democratic politics, made me actually laugh out loud when I read your comment.

            Thanks for that.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I hope you’re young and this is your idealism talking, otherwise you’re just delusional.

        I’ve been through too many election cycles, and worked on enough campaigns, to see this as anything but the empty campaign rhetoric that it is.

        But hey, please come back and rub this “L” in my face if that promised debt relief ever comes through.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Old enough to know the establishment Democrats only serve the donor class and have no intention of changing the material conditions for anyone else.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The only thing standing in his way in previous attempts was the Republicans.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am all for it. Just wish it didn’t take a genocide for his numbers to dip far enough to need the PR boost

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Stupidest fucking thing I’ve read on lemmy.

        But, that is to be expected from someone evil enough to put genocide in quotes.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is obvious disinformation.

        The fact that you put genocide in quotes says everything anyone needs to know about your non-existent morality.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which part of US leadership supports Israel, then? I mean, backing them at the UN, shipping weapons and stuff? Genuine question, just because from the outside looking in, it really seems like it’s the US and only the US propping up Israel right now.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s still bipartisan, sadly. 100% of the GOP are behind Israel, and maybe 50% of Dem leadership at this point.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              EDIT: Can’t do it apparently.

              I find it exceedingly strange that you made this edit 30 minutes after posting a response to a 6-hour old comment. Not sure what you think it proves.

              Sanders, AOC, nearly any progressive in Congress; fuck, even Pelosi, who is certainly not a progressive, has gotten in on it. Opinions have changed rapidly. Sorry you haven’t been paying attention, I guess.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I made the edit because three people came by to down vote but had no response. You’d have a point if nobody had seen the comment. Obviously that wasn’t the case.

                And since when is Sanders or AOC considered Dem leadership? And three examples isn’t even close to “50%”

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You’d have a point if nobody had seen the comment. Obviously that wasn’t the case.

                  … fucking what? How is that at all relevant?

                  Quite clearly you aren’t interested in a serious conversation.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Biden has been against it far longer than he’s been for it. I’m voting for him, but let’s not pretend he’s a good guy here. He had his opportunities to do something and he refused, despite his fellow Democrats begging him to act. He refused to extend the time for the payback; him and no one else.

        He has never stated that he’s changed his position - he’s just thrown out soundbites like he’s done so far. No actual action has taken place other than what was already happening without him. He’s sped up some already existing processes. Whoopee.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          He literally forgave $146k from my wife’s student loans, after predatory student loan advisors had her refinance her loans years ago, claiming she would qualify for 20 year forgiveness, but in reality didn’t qualify. She just realized about 4-5years ago and got back on the right track, but it was going to be 20 years from then.

          You hand wave the effect that his express actions have had on real, hard working and struggling citizens. I’m here to tell you that they have had a major affect on our lives, and have honored the spirit of the deal that she entered, and had been cheated out of. And there are many, many others.

          And this is speaking as someone who was fortunate enough to have my parents pay for my education in full. I have never been burdened by student debt, and I view it is an absolutely wonderful and vital action to ensure that the US retains its status as one of the most highly educated work forces in the world.

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I’m glad it worked out for you and your wife. There’s a lot of people who don’t have jobs deemed “righteous” enough to be worthy of “forgiveness” for the predatory costs of college, lending practices of the institutions, and restrictive legislation of the politicians that have created an indentured servitude for most of your fellow Americans.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Or those like me, who actively left one of the schools deemed predatory because I saw the writing on the wall.

              Because I left before the place shut down (about a year before it did, woulda still been in school) I get nothing forgiven, I already applied and got denied.

              I’m happy for those who got their loans forgiven, but I am incrddibly irate at how very specific it’s been and how directly that’s fucked me despite also being lied to and fucked around (for example I had to sign my onboarding documentation FIVE TIMES because of vague “oh you did this wrong do it again” and I’m 80% sure some numbers changed between the first and last one

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              She wasn’t in a “righteous” job, she was self employed and qualified for some reduced income based program. I can’t remember all of the details, but for many years she was paying around $1400/mo, and then went into some program to help reduce the payments after losing her condo in the recession.

              The point I’m trying to make is that we need to support his efforts to absolve more people’s loans. He’s trying to do a lot more than he has already done, but he’s fighting the GOP and even some from his own party. The wins he has gotten have helped people like my wife and I substantially, and if he continues to get the publics support, that gives him leverage to keep chipping away and widening the scope to hopefully include people like you and your loved ones as well.

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If that happens, I believe there will be some idiots protest it. Something like “I paid for my full tuition, and so must you!”.

      • FlaminGoku@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        More like a lot. The “fuck you, got mine” mindset is unfortunately a common outcome of the “rugged individualism” propaganda perpetuating America.

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are you talking about Biden’s efforts specifically or more generally? Because Biden is constrained by:

      1. Having to act in the framework of what existing laws let him do as Congress won’t pass anything.
      2. Most colleges are regulated by individual states and the federal government’s power to regulate them is very limited.
      • Tonycorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re not wrong. But there are still tools available at the federal level. States also have control over their legal drinking age, but if they want federal assistance for maintaining their roads it has to be 21.

        You could set a functional tuition cap by saying Federal Student Aid is only available if tuition is <$15k/year

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because it’s easier to rag on Biden than it is to actually educate oneself on what’s been accomplished.

        • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          For me it’s a case of “I’ll believe it when I see it.” Not ragging on Biden, I believe he’s earnest in his desire to do something about student loan debt, but it’s all the road blocks that are put in his way. A lot of people don’t want student loan debt relief for whatever reason.

          • Wrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s fair. I have experienced it 2nd hand through my wife, so I am believing it because I’ve seen it. That was a massive relief after she had faithfully paid her loan for 20 years, but due to dishonest loan advisers and refinancers, she was exactly one of the victims that John Oliver made an episode about.

            Biden fixed it and forgave her loan, which was still substantial after 20 years.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, my ex is still paying hers after 20 years, but does not fit any of the categories Biden has been able to help. We expect her to finally pay it off in the next couple of years without help.

              Of course we’re all for as many people as possible being helped, even if it’s not her.

            • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Hey man, I’m happy for her. Sometimes things do work out. But again, until that balance is reduced through something other than my paycheck, I won’t hold my breath

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The problem is when it happens no one ever sees it.

            Biden does all kinds of good stuff and the media ignores it.

            • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, agreed. The Biden administration isn’t great at banging it’s chest and boasting. Take out a full page and in the NYT kind of stuff.

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Good. So you’re fine with what he’s doing. He promised exactly what he did. The supreme court killed his original plan which he did try to execute, so that’s on the court, not him.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Democrats “try” all sorts of shit they know has no chance of succeeding and then fumble golden opportunities. Joe Biden is a politician and a trash human being. He created the student debt problem.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The headline: “Biden passes new round of student loan forgiveness!”

      The article: “Asian American rail workers earning between $5000 and $7000 per year, who are veterans of the Vietnam War and are currently experiencing homelessness, will now have their student loans forgiven under Biden’s new sweeping legislation.”

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Shame the Green Party doesn’t seem to care about any races other than President. Maybe a Green majority Congress could eliminate all debt, but having Congressional representation isn’t a priority of theirs. It’s rather telling.

  • Beebabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I will maybe purchase a home before I’m dead. I don’t have a useless degree. In fact, it’s an in-demand field and the salary was considered respectable when I began. Cost of living increases have eaten away at that. But my other choice was to continue to be an assistant at poverty wage. So when the higher salaries and specialties are gatekept by a huge monetary sum you either get a bunch of people with some debt or only the privileged may access knowledge and a brighter future. We have to decide as a society which one we want and stop loathing our neighbors for the system they didn’t create.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not really a great analogy though, is it, since Biden wasn’t the one who pulled the football up the first time. His administration has also been working constantly, using every way they can, to forgive as much student loan debt as possible. That’s after the SCOTUS ruling.

      Say what you will about him, but Biden has shown that, at least on this issue, he’s doing everything in his power to get rid of as much as possible. And he’s already changed the lives of hundreds of thousands of borrowers… Again, after his plan got shot down.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they get this done in time for the election… They will try to get the timing right though so it motivates people to vote.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        He did pull the football. He campaigned on $50k forgiveness and then negotiated down to $10k after he was elected.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, he did what he said he would do, and the Supreme Court stopped it from going into effect. The conservative establishment sued the government to stop it from happening.

          MOHELA, one of the apparent plaintiffs on the lawsuit, is on record prior to the court case saying that they had no interest in suing and that they don’t know why this lawsuit was being brought in their name. There was no standing whatsoever, the case shouldn’t even have been heard.

          Regardless, no, Biden didn’t pull the football. In fact, his efforts to forgive tens of millions of dollars since the SCOTUS ruling, in addition to this article, indicate that he’s still planning on following through on that campaign promise.

          I’m glad he didn’t just give up after he SCOTUS ruling. Every other President that’s been in office during my lifetime would 100% have given up after losing that case. Especially given that the benefits tend to skew younger, and a more cynical, real politik person would cut their losses, claim they tried, and move onto sometime that they think will net them more votes.

          • GhostFence@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Let me break this down for the simple minded:

            1. Biden proposes $50k in student debt forgiveness.

            2. Republicans fight him to make it $0.

            3. Supreme Court sides with Republicans.

            4. They force Biden to make it $10k just so it will pass.

            5. “Biden pulled a Lucy on his voters!”

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yeah… I can’t tell the difference anymore between conservative idiots and actual real tankies. That’s how close many of their talking points have gotten… I guess if one thing has been consistent throughout modern history, it’s that political groups on the left will always sabotage their own success with infighting on petty minutiae and making perfect the enemy of good. Yes, I know the Democrats aren’t “on the left” etc. etc. etc… I’ve made my point. We’re always our own worst enemy.

              • GhostFence@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s simply NOT true. When the Republicans are bulldozed out of the way, Democrats go full speed ahead. Look at California. Newsom has gone absolute gangbusters with the GOP helpless in his path. We’re a bullet train of progress here!

                • prole@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Note: So to briefly pause here: I’m not exactly sure what happened, but I may have gotten a little carried away with this comment, it just kind of wrote itself and I couldn’t stop. I’m not even sure how much it pertains to your comment lol sorry. It’s long, so I wouldn’t fault anyone for skipping the rest. That said, I do think it makes some important, albeit possibly already well known points.

                  What did I say that’s not true? There is a long and storied history of leftists failing to accomplish meaningful change on a large scale due to petty infighting (for example, New Jersey exists) and self-imposed purity tests…

                  My comment assumes that the one I’m replying to is sincere and arguing in good faith. This is the internet, so you never know. Either way, this comment isn’t just for him, it’s for anyone who may see this thread and are curious about whether or not Democrats are progressive or vice-versa. So who knows, maybe someone else will read this and learn something new lol you never know…

                  My initial thought was that you seem to be making the mistake of conflating “progressive” with “democrat”. Are there progressives that caucus with the Democratic party? Sure (though begrudgingly). And why do you think they do that, rather than starting a third party of their own? After all, these neo-libs are just as bad as conservatives in their minds. Why do you think that progressive politicians in the US choose to caucus with the 'dem like 98% of the time? And leftists just cannot help themselves. We have some compulsion to zero-in on that often arbitrary 2% difference, Ultimate gatekeeping. Rather than celebrating the 98% of views we agree on, it is decided that cooperation is impossible.

                  It wasn’t always just Bernie out there on a limb; Some of us are old enough to remember people like Dennis Kucinich (and his disproportionately hot and cool wife lol), Mike Gravel, and last, but absolutely not least: Howard Dean, a "progressive-adjacent Democrat who was set to potentially win the nomination. And I can hear it already/again: “he’s not a true progressive because xyz, so he doesn’t count as a one!”

                  In all seriousness I truly believe Howard Dean’s career was deliberately assassinated because at the time, he was running the DNC like a well-oiled machine— his ‘fifty-state strategy’ was showing very real results. The GOP saw a future where they’re fighting for their lives in just about every state, knowing full well that they have no actual policy to run on. Republicans were threatened by this already, and the thought of him becoming President absolutely terrified them. So they assassinated his career for the dumbest reason ever (with the media and center-left complicit, of course),

                  What we need are more progressive politicians who are willing to actively caucus with the Democratic party. Once you get a large enough contingent, they will begin having actual power in the party’s policies.

                  So to get to my original main point before this comment transformed into something entirely different:

                  Given we must accept reality as it is, and given that that the reality is that we only have two parties is this country, we really have no choice:

                  1. a lukewarm neo-liberal party that has had no real choice but to follow the Overton Window (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window) further and further right or face extinction and ultimately cede power to the other party. Have you see what the “opposition party” looks like in places like Russia, and or,

                  2. literal racist, bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, fascists (their dumbasses don’t need to know the definition of something to be it) who are working tirelessly to take away basic rights

                  I am aware of Israel/Palestine, and I am 100% against Netanyahu’s campaign of genocide. Which is why voting for Donald Trump, who wants to give Netanyahu carte blanche (literally told him to “get it done faster” in contrast to everyone else in the world telling him to chill the fuck out).

                  If you give a single shit about the plea of the Palestinian people, and haven’t just latched onto a cause for attention or whatever, then you would understand why you need to vote for Joe Biden.

                  The reality of political party dynamics is incredibly complex and nuanced. The Democratic party in particular is so diverse not just of ethnicity, but of beliefs, opinions, etc. I mean look at this, I think the data speaks for itself: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/01/09/u-s-congress-continues-to-grow-in-racial-ethnic-diversity/

                  Here is my main point (I think):

                  I must emphasize, THIS IS HOW THE SITUATION IS AT THIS MOMENT. That is, until young progressives recognize that perfect is the enemy of the good, and that they are able to collectively change the ethos and platform of the Democratic party. And that’s how you get a progressive party in a two party system. Problem is, young people don’t vote.

                  Again, apologies for the crazy long comment, this wasn’t planned. I hope at least someone reads it. Cheers!

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              “I do think in this moment of economic pain and strain that we should be eliminating interest on the debts that are accumulated, No. 1. And No. 2, I’m prepared to write off the $10,000 debt, but not [$50,000],” Biden said, saying he doesn’t believe it can be done with presidential action.

              Emphasis mine.

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Assuming you actually believe what you’re saying here, then you’ve got a lot to learn about how the world works.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I know enough about how democracy works to know I’m not voting for the guy again. We’re not fucking around here. Make material compromises with leftists or progressives or lose to MAGA. Make a choice.

                • prole@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  We’re not fucking around here.

                  Lol how old are you? This your first election? Maybe Democrats will make concessions to progressives when we (and young people in general) fucking show up to vote consistently. And not only in presidential races.

                  Until then, you’re naive if you think you can make ultimatums like that… It’s laughable.

                  What I was referring to about learning how the world works, was learning how things actually get done in reality, not in your books on poli sci theory.

                  First off, Biden isn’t a king. The president does not have carte blanche to just eliminate hundreds of billions of dollars in personal debt with the swipe of a pen. Frankly, I would not want that power vested in one person. If he were more authoritarian-inclined, he might try (though authoritarians seem to never use that power to help anyone buy themselves and their buddies), and there are several potential outcomes of that, and none of them end with him getting the thing he originally wanted… Nothing happens in this kind of system without compromise (which is why we see the Republicans’ obstructionism works), so yes, $50k becomes $10k.

                  There is also this thing called “political capital”… I’m not going to waste any more of my time when you probably won’t even read this far…

    • Comrade GitGud@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well, he doesn’t need to bail out Israel so he doesn’t need to recover that debt, but he will bail out Israel so he will recover that debt.