48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s not the plasma that melts anything but neutron bombardment. The containment and fizzling out issue is the same whether the plasma produces neutrons or just tons of EM radiation which is what I focussed on.

    That sturdiness of the cladding things is an important factor when it comes to making cost-effective reactors, that is, the price you sell electricity for needs to cover replacement parts, but is not really that much of an issue when it comes to achieving fusion the materials we have are sufficient for that. Proxima Fusion (the Max Planck spinout) is working on those economical issues for their commercial prototype (early 2030), it remains to be seen whether they go for durable and expensive or cheap but needs to be replaced more often. Which isn’t unusual for power plants in general, none of them run 24/7 they get shut down for maintenance once in a while.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s not the plasma that melts anything but neutron bombardment.

      I’m aware (I read the article, including the part I quoted you), but regardless of the source of the melting, there is a melting issue of the containment vessel that needs to be engineered away.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, and you won’t get me to argue here. I’m too experienced a smart-Alec to contradict another smart-Alec :)