smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 年前95.121% accuracyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down10cross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up19arrow-down1image95.121% accuracyi.imgur.comsmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 年前message-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 年前Actually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
minus-squareCevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 年前But the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)
Actually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
But the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)