no its not photoshop (i have video proof)

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wait, really? I’m surprised it’s that low-res. I woulda thought it’d be more expensive to get a couple camera sensors that low res than to buy a couple 10mp sensors or something (I would think sensors that low res were totally obsolete and not really made anymore, making higher res sensors cheaper)

        • euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          i mean im just guessing here, but i can count the pixels very easily in already low res heaset. no idea if its possible to see the real resolution

        • Janet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          could be “good” sensors but low bandwidth settings. some cameras you can actually set (as the manufacturer) what/how it’s sensing in the firmware

        • euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          i’ve just done extensive research on the cameras, it seems the cameras output just 480x320 resolution, and their max is apparently 640x480. and its not a good framerate either, like, way under 30fps. what made it hard was ifixit couldnt find any identifications on the sensors in their teardown.