Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 6 months agoBring out the rule booklemmy.worldimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageBring out the rule booklemmy.worldUltragigagigantic@lemmy.world to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square82fedilinkcross-posted to: anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months ago Rules HAVE to exist. Enforcers HAVE to exist. Yes, that’s the fundamental contradiction of anarchism. Rules need rulers.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoAnarchism IS NOT about “no rule makers”. It is wholly about JUSTIFIED AUTHORITY, not NO authority.
minus-squareMeatballs@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoCan you cite a source that says this that isn’t Wikipedia please? Or are you just making it up to fit your own personal beliefs about the subject
minus-squareMeatballs@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoSo you’re not willing to cite a source? Typical for your types
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoOh look, nothing but an ignorant, obstinant attempt at an insult. Maybe you’ll get one when you prove to be smarter than a triggered 11 year old.
Yes, that’s the fundamental contradiction of anarchism. Rules need rulers.
Anarchism IS NOT about “no rule makers”. It is wholly about JUSTIFIED AUTHORITY, not NO authority.
Can you cite a source that says this that isn’t Wikipedia please? Or are you just making it up to fit your own personal beliefs about the subject
So you’re not willing to cite a source? Typical for your types
Oh look, nothing but an ignorant, obstinant attempt at an insult. Maybe you’ll get one when you prove to be smarter than a triggered 11 year old.
Do they? Why?