Yes, and that’s what virtue signaling is, just making a public statement about something without any actual follow-through. It’s just grandstanding and moral posturing, nothing else.
It’s “I care about the climate” while driving a massive gas guzzler, or “I’m on a diet” while ordering a double whopper.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the Attorney General can’t overrule the Supreme Court anyways, so what difference does it make?
I think they were just making a public statement that they didn’t support this, that’s it.
Yes, and that’s what virtue signaling is, just making a public statement about something without any actual follow-through. It’s just grandstanding and moral posturing, nothing else.
It’s “I care about the climate” while driving a massive gas guzzler, or “I’m on a diet” while ordering a double whopper.
He decides which cases are prosecuted. He doesn’t have to overrule them if he never presses charges when someone is arrested for this.
That wouldn’t make much of a difference if what https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/8070645 said is true.