• caveman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That Iranian “attack” was so slow and gave so much room of manouver to Israel that I believe was done to save the face of the government to it’s population.

    And Israel can also claim superiority and feel it doesn’t have to retaliate. Better than an escalation.

    Another perspective would be that Iran used this so force Israel to reveal it’s de defense positions and have to chance them at a very high cost:

    https://mondoweiss.net/2024/04/why-irans-retaliatory-attack-against-israel-was-not-a-failure/

    • sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Israel used lots of seriously expensive munitions and suffered damages to military sites, I don’t know why y’all expect Iran to Nuke Tel-Aviv just because of an attack on an embassy.

      Westerners are going full mask-off over this, really shows the jingoism that y’all expect us to kill over a million civilians because of an embassy. That’s exactly what the USA would do.