A new bill, the first of its kind in the U.S., would ban security screening company Clear from operating at California airports as lawmakers take aim at companies that let consumers pay to pass through security ahead of other travelers.

Sen. Josh Newman, a California Democrat and the sponsor of the legislation, said Clear effectively lets wealthier people skip in front of passengers who have been waiting to be screened by Transportation Security Administration agents.

“It’s a basic equity issue when you see people subscribed to a concierge service being escorted in front of people who have waited a long time to get to the front of TSA line,” Newman told CBS MoneyWatch. “Everyone is beaten down by the travel experience, and if Clear escorts a customer in front of you and tells TSA, ‘Sorry, I have someone better,’ it’s really frustrating.”

If passed, the bill would bar Clear, a private security clearance company founded in 2010, from airports in California. Clear charges members $189 per year to verify passengers’ identities at airports and escort them through security, allowing them to bypass TSA checkpoints. The service is in use at roughly 50 airports across the U.S., as well as at dozens of sports stadiums and other venues.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good. It is already a multitiered system and there is no reason to let it be any worse. Rich fucks should wait in line with us unwashed masses.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nah, eff that. I fly a lot both for business and for vacations, so I have high status and get upgraded every flight. Those upgrades get me a special security line, even though I’m not rich. If I had to wait in the normal line every flight behind people who have no idea how to take off their shoes, let alone that they have to take them off, I just wouldn’t fly for work. Most of the people in those lines (Clear, TSA Pre, First Class) are people who travel a lot for work and know how to go through security faster. They also have to deal with that shit more often. Some of them are just rich assholes, but most of them are business travelers who would have significantly worse lives because you hate rich people.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You: “Rich fucks should wait in line with us”

          Also you: “Oh no I have to wait in line for a few more minutes. Woe is me woe is me.”

          So if it isn’t such a big deal to wait in line for a few more minutes, then why do you have a problem with rich people paying extra to avoid it? You are happy, they are happy, right?

            • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              But you just said a few more minutes is no big deal. Woe is me woe is me. If you don’t care about a few more minutes, then why do you care if your line is a little longer?

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                What part is your rich ass not getting? There are four lines if everyone just waits in the lines the lines move quick. If you make a special rich person line it means the other three move slowly as one line isn’t at capacity.

                I do not know how clear I can make it. Your rich person line sucks, you suck if you use it, and everyone has to suffer because you looked at a finite resource and said “fuck you, I got mine”.

                • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  OK, so you refuse to acknowledge what you said about it not mattering much to you if the line takes a little longer.

  • TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Good, absolute insanity it was ever allowed in the first place. Hope more states follow the same path.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    As annoyed as I get with Clear skipping the line, why is it any different with First Class/Sky Priority separate lines that skip to the front? This is just an extra fee to skip even that line. I’m a frequent traveler (both business and pleasure), so I get upgraded every flight. It annoys me when airports don’t have Sky Priority lines (I’m looking at you IND!) or the Sky Priority line doesn’t actually skip anything (Delta’s new LAX terminal design), so I don’t fundamentally have a problem with Clear. I’m just too cheap to pay for it. In DEN, Sky Priority is absolutely necessary because of how unbelievably stupid their security setup is.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know why clear pisses me off so much but it does. It’s just not fair imo, but life isn’t fair.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pre check isn’t any better. I went through an airport last year that had 16 stations for pre check and 3 for everyone else. The line for those 3 stations wrapped around the airport.

  • greyhathero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dislike this. I never saw it as a wealthy skip the line. It’s not that expensive . And they are on their private jets already. It’s great for those of us that travel enough for work that it justifies the cost. When you fly more than once a week it’s nice to be able to pay to not have to wait for those that do it twice a year(and are not as efficient due to lack of practice)

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Once everyone is using it, no one is getting value from it. Then it’s just another unneeded fee you have to pay not to wait 2 hours. This is disney-like squeeze for more money.

      You always have to consider the insidious nature of things like this… once they’re common and you have to use them not to wait, everyone will be in the same place, minus $300 a year. Yes, I raised the price; once a large number of travelers are onboarded and you have to use it or wait forever, that’s what the company will do.

      • greyhathero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not defending the company per se. I assume they are just as scummy as the next, but I don’t see why everyone would sign up. There’s next to no value there if you don’t travel alot

  • Rexios@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    So what’s the difference between this and TSA pre check? You have to pay for that too so the money privilege argument makes no sense here.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      TSA Precheck involves a background check and interview performed by the government. This allows them to make the actual screening process lighter, because they’ve deemed you to be low risk.

      With Clear, you still have to go through the full security check. And it also costs significantly more.

      • Precheck: $14/y
      • Clear: 190$/y

      The cost of TSA Precheck is $70 for 5 years, so $14 per year (plus an additional $8 for the initial enrollment). If you travel internationally a lot you can upgrade to Global Entry for $100 for 5 years. Or if you travel to Canada frequently, you can get Nexus (a superset of Global Entry) at $50 for 5 years.

      It’s hard to make the money privilege argument with Precheck at that price.

    • frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Kind of. TSA Precheck is <$100 for 5 years, so it’s significantly cheaper. That amount is a lot more accessible to average travelers than CLEAR.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most people enrolled in those programs are frequent business travelers who charge it to the company.

        When I was traveling all the time I did global entry. Since it was for work, I paid for it with my companies credit card. I also did the interview during company hours, drove to the interview in a company vehicle, and paid for parking and lunch on the company dime.

        Nobody blinked at the expense. Of course it was the same month I traveled for 3 weeks, hit 5 countries and 10 states. It took me a full day to do my expense report.

    • kaitco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is my exact question, too. I have Pre-Check and I love it because it is like travelling prior to Sept-11.

      Pre-Check is cheaper than Clear because it’s like $100 but it lasts for 2-3 years, so again, it’s a separation between those who can pay and those who can’t. Also, what’s next? Every airline removes First, Business, Basic Economy “classes”?

      Banning Clear doesn’t resolve the “class” issue. What would be better is to just improve the entire TSA process so that it’s not so miserable for everyone, or let’s get more of those high-speed rails built so we have more travel options and airlines have enough competition to force improvement.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        TSA Pre is $75 for five years.

        The problem with services like Clear is that for even more money, you get to skip to the front of the TSA Pre line, too. It also means that a private company (with what kind of oversight, do we even know?) gets to do the security screening instead of TSA.

        If you don’t think it’s all security theater, I don’t know what to say.

    • bobburger@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      From what I can tell there are two main differences:

      1. TSA pre check isn’t guaranteed; you can have pre check and still be randomly selected for a full screening. Clear you always get a “light” screening.
      2. Pre check you still go through the TSA security, just with a less intensive screening and shorter line. Clear has it’s own little security area that bypasses TSA completely

      There maybe others, but these seem to be the most important.

  • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Neoliberalism y’all, TSA’s equipment and all the services that go along with it are actually revenue streams invented by mega donors. The “free” market in action.

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Everyone is beaten down by the travel process

    TSA has been proven to be a sham time and time again. They’re ineffective at best. Just get rid of it already.

    I also fail to see how this is really any different than paying for TSA pre check. The only main difference is skipping the security line but what difference is that really? Both are paid for services that allow the “rich” (yeah right) to get through security quicker. The real rich aren’t traveling in public transportation. Why don’t we ban private planes?

    Oh and no offense to the, mostly, good people working there with the public on the front lines. They’re typically pleasant and great with the kids in my family’s experience.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      TSA Precheck involves a background check and interview. This allows the actual screening process to be lighter.

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I had to go through a full interview to get a TSA precheck. Lots of invasive probing questions about who I am and where I work and what my family ties are.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            My initial application was like eight (?) years ago, I wonder if they’ve changed it? Maybe they don’t interview everyone?

              • Nougat@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Based on this completely ad hoc “survey,” that would indicate that they do perform interviews, but not for everyone.

                I’m sure there’s not any racial profiling going on, no sir.

    • just_change_it@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The real rich

      What some lower-middle class Americans don’t realize is that to the great majority of people in this world… we are the rich.

      In the US we look at someone making $75,000+, $100,000+, $150,000+, $250,000+, 500,000+, 1,000,000+, 1,000,000,000+ as rich… depending on what our current income level is. The reality is that even making 30k in the middle of nowhere is still better than 85% of the world’s income and quality of living.

      If you can save $10,000 a year you can save more than 60% of people in the world actually earn.

      When I point this stuff out though I get a ton of downvotes. Imagine buying a car, a plane ticket, or personal electronics when your total pre-tax pay is 10k or less… that is most people’s situation who are alive today (but less than 30% of Americans!) As a bonus, imported goods are typically cheaper in the US then almost any other country. Hair Gel that is $5 here is easily $20 USD in Santiago, Chile.

      There should be way more taxes on the highest earners and more mechanisms that siphon wealth away from those with extreme excess. Just be aware that Americans overall have the most to lose if this goes to a global scale. A lot of things we take for granted and expect are luxury for billions.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And when those people have to live in the US you can make the direct comparison. Go look up PPP. That’s why you get downvoted so hard. For example 30k US is 90k in India. Solidly Middle Class but not wealthy. And before you shout about how much 90,000 USD would buy in India, that’s not the comparison. The comparison is in lifestyle. So they’re living in the US the way a middle class person in India would live. The number just contextualizes it.

        Also, using a country that’s the dictionary example of monetary and fiscal mismanagement might not be the best way to go.

        • just_change_it@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          PPP falls apart when you consider the price of consumer electronics, electricity, gasoline, airfare…

          In the Dominican Republic you can’t get completely stable electricity. It just doesn’t happen without generators/batteries. Generators aren’t suddenly cheaper in DR. It’s 20DOP for 1kwh of electricity in DR, or $0.34 USD/kwh. I pay less in the greater Boston area. Wages there are way, WAY below 30k/year. The thought of having air conditioning at home is practically impossible for almost all who live there.

          I love how you nitpicked the chile reference (with no counterpoint whatsoever) but it’s true across Latin America. Imported goods to poorer nations generally cost way above and beyond what the US pays…unless it’s prescription drugs because almost all other nations negotiate those prices to be much, much less than what the US pays (and only just started negotiating… for JUST Medicare.) I’m sure there are other examples as well. The PPP is so far apart on imports it’s insane. Often times things are sold in the US even if they are made locally because the price in the US is way above and beyond what the locals can afford.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            And you’re not cherry picking? I’ve been to developing countries. It’s not cardboard shacks. Yeah they don’t generally have central air and electricity cuts are common. But they have houses, mass transit, good food, bars, smartphones, etc.

            Things have improved a lot over the last fifty years. If you want to complain that a bag of Cheetos is expensive and they have to buy Rosquillas de Quesito instead you’re not going to find much sympathy among people actually trying to improve lives.

            Also, I did provide a counter example. I didn’t mention India just for giggles. It’s got one of the largest populations that still score as poverty stricken in the global sense. That don’t have running water, don’t have access to transit, smart phones, healthcare, good jobs, electricity, or safe food.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m not really a fan of BI for hard info but I checked back in and it looks like they’ve basically eliminated extreme poverty.

                This is the stuff I like to read about -

                These include a national mission for construction of toilets and attempts to ensure universal access to electricity, modern cooking fuel, and more recently, piped water. As an example, rural access to piped water in India as of 15th August 2019 was 16.8% and at present it is 74.7%. The reduced sickness from accessing safe water may have helped families earn more income. Similarly, under the Aspirational District Program, 112 districts of the country were identified as having the lowest development indicators. These districts were targeted by government policies with an explicit focus on improving their performance in development.

                So yeah, I’m absolutely elated to read that.

                • just_change_it@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Man… they use a metric of $2.57/day in 2023 dollars to define the level of extreme poverty? That’s $938.05 a year. Just wow.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Clear doesn’t skip screening… It skips to the front of the line to be screened.

      Everyone still gets screened.

      • czech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are also pre-screened and interviewed to get into the program.

        • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They offered me a free skip to get me to try it. I refused… being more wealthy than some people doesn’t make me better than them.

          • czech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Are you sure? There is a 6-month+ wait to schedule an interview for the Clear program in most places. It’s not something they can pull you out of line to give you a free trial… There is a background check and in-person interview as part of the process.

            I use pre-check because I travel often for work. That registration process involves bringing in more documentation than is required to normally fly, a background check and fingerprints.

            • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes, I was in line at… either SFO or San Bernidino, it’s been a while. They asked if I wanted to try it and I asked what it was, then they said the personal info they wanted and I said no way. They had people walking along their empty line talking to people in the TSA line. The TSA line was actually moving pretty smoothly that day, I bet they got more takers on slow days.

        • cbarrick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, but it doesn’t really matter.

          The federal government doesn’t trust Clear enough to let them into the Precheck line.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, but that doesn’t change anything at all about the actual screening process. That pre-screen and interview only lets them get past the initial line. They still have to do everything like a normal person.

          • czech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I have pre-check but it looks like Clear just cut the pre-check line. Pre-check is more like a pre-911 airport experience. Shoes and jackets typically stay on. If you don’t trip the metal detector you’re good to go.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good Guy California getting rid of pay-to-win subscription for air travel.

  • jve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I have a buddy who accidentally tried to fly with a gun in his bag out of DFW.

    He has his concealed carry permit, and this was in Texas, so he had to pay a fairly substantial fine, but that was it (yes, he’s a white guy). Still made his flight in time.

    Same friend had TSA pre check and Clear. TSA precheck, to their credit, stripped him of the privilege. Clear is still fine with this, though.