Columbia University and other schools have taken steps to try to address students' concerns over safety and freedom of expression. Follow for live news updates.
See a few comments back, where you couldn’t respond to “anecdotal evidence is crap and you can’t support your assertion” so you just deflected with some tangentially related bullshit? And where you called someone a coward for doing exactly what you’re doing, avoiding addressing clearly made critical points?
By your own criteria, you’re a coward. You complain about name calling, yet engage in it yourself when it’s convenient. You’re a hypocrite and a coward, by your own admission, and I’m calling you out because you’re shitting up the place by being what the other poster aptly noted as the quintessential “my point is whatever makes me right at this moment, even if I’ll contradict my stance immediately afterward to be right somewhere else” type of poster. You actively make this a worse place to be.
That’s the point. Looking forward to see how you deflect this.
You need to read the whole thing to put it in context. You have no idea what my criteria is. I haven’t called you a name, though the same can’t be said of you. You bring nothing new, but might as well be the same person. Try something original. Make a point. Don’t repeat ad nauseum. I know you can do it.
Listen, your BS really means nothing to me. You can repeat the same stuff again and again and it will still mean nothing because it has no substance. So go enjoy life and leave me alone. I’m not your type.
It has substance, you’re just too much of a coward to actually consider it, which is why you can’t respond to any of it. You’re very transparent.
Speaking of transparent, what I say means so little that you just can’t stop responding. It’s funny, you aren’t even self aware enough to realize that your deflections don’t make sense.
See a few comments back, where you couldn’t respond to “anecdotal evidence is crap and you can’t support your assertion” so you just deflected with some tangentially related bullshit? And where you called someone a coward for doing exactly what you’re doing, avoiding addressing clearly made critical points?
By your own criteria, you’re a coward. You complain about name calling, yet engage in it yourself when it’s convenient. You’re a hypocrite and a coward, by your own admission, and I’m calling you out because you’re shitting up the place by being what the other poster aptly noted as the quintessential “my point is whatever makes me right at this moment, even if I’ll contradict my stance immediately afterward to be right somewhere else” type of poster. You actively make this a worse place to be.
That’s the point. Looking forward to see how you deflect this.
You need to read the whole thing to put it in context. You have no idea what my criteria is. I haven’t called you a name, though the same can’t be said of you. You bring nothing new, but might as well be the same person. Try something original. Make a point. Don’t repeat ad nauseum. I know you can do it.
Yeah, I figured you’d just lie and deflect some more. At least this was all good for a laugh.
Oh great a stalker
Listen, your BS really means nothing to me. You can repeat the same stuff again and again and it will still mean nothing because it has no substance. So go enjoy life and leave me alone. I’m not your type.
It has substance, you’re just too much of a coward to actually consider it, which is why you can’t respond to any of it. You’re very transparent.
Speaking of transparent, what I say means so little that you just can’t stop responding. It’s funny, you aren’t even self aware enough to realize that your deflections don’t make sense.
Can you?
All hope is gone. Still nothing there.
This comment thread was a wild ride. I’ve never seen anyone cope this hard before. You know it’s not a competition, right?