Images posted within the last 48 hours will appear as broken. This is expected and intended.

Yesterday 2023-08-27 a community on the lemmy.world instance received multiple posts containing CSAM (or as it is more commonly known CP) content, which spread throughout the federation. We also ended up becoming involuntary hosts of said content.

Due to the severely limited nature of the Lemmy moderation tools, removing or purging the incriminated posts from the admin UI wasn’t sufficient and didn’t cause the images to be actually removed from our server. Because of this, a nuclear option was required. I have deleted every image saved by our server during the last 48 hours.

Unfortunately this also includes a post on !pcm@lemmy.basedcount.com , as well as multiple posts on !returntomonke@lemmy.basedcount.com. Authors of the affected posts can fix them by re-uploading their images, without the need to recreate the posts.

We are sorry for the inconvenience, but hosting CSAM content is highly illegal and we simply can’t take any risks on this front.

I am currently discussing with the other admins whether further measures are necessary, to prevent this from happening in the future. We’ll keep you posted if we have any updates.

EDIT [2023-08-28 10:00 UTC]:

The attack is still ongoing. I have now blocked the community and further deleted the last 15 minutes of images.

  • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy needs an option for admins to not cache federated media, and only deliver it from it’s originating instance on request. That way, the offending server can handle it or be defederated if theyret complicit without this systemic, network wide cleanup job, it’s a huge security vulnerability to the network as a whole.

    • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah good points.

      not cache federated media

      That’s actually likely to come in the next update (pull request). It actually was proposed as a measure to save space, rather than to fix a security issue, but it do nonetheless.

      only deliver it from it’s originating instance on request

      Don’t think I agree with this. It’s not so easy as an admin to identify contents of this kind getting posted on your instance or knowing that you have trolls among your userbase. It’s the kind of stuff that is hard to predict and once it’s happened it’s already too late. As an alternative I would propose:

      • fix the damn “purge” button: we actually do have a button to delete content off the database on the admin interface. Only thing is, it doesn’t currently cover image caches, those stay indefinitely unless manually deleted from the terminal, as I did today. This is a MAJOR flaw and should be fixed ASAP
      • someone in the admin matrix chat proposed federated purges. It’s somewhat controversial, but basically means that the content would get automatically deleted on all instances if the admin of the instance where it was originally posted presses the purge button. That way the lemmy.world admin could have automatically solved the problem for every other instance.
      • kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For federated purges, would it make sense for a purging instance to send an automated notice of contaminated content to all federated instances? Then admins can set whether they want to handle it manually or automatically?

        But it seems like it should be possible to purge recent posts only from a particular instance only.

        • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it does make a lot of sense. But given the current state of Lemmy I doubt we can expect such a high degree of interactivity on the admin side. I think we will more likely get a dumb checkbox that, when ticked, will automatically purge the content without asking for an admin’s opinion.

          And hell, after this, I would tick it without thinking twice.

          • kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I would too if i were you. But at least that way if people are abusing the feature there would be the option to prevent it. Is the developement discussion for lemmy here on lemmy or on git?

            This is exactly the sort of thing that the centralized services could use to try to stop federation; smooth handling of this shit ought to be a developement priority.

            • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is the developement discussion for lemmy here on lemmy or on git?

              I’d say the bulk of the discussion happens in github issues. There’s also a matrix room dedicated to the development of Lemmy but it hasn’t received much traffic lately.

      • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The two quotes of mine are functionally equivalent. Not caching data and delivering from the source on request are the same thing.

        • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From the way you worded it I understood it as:

          • I get the option to not cache images posted by anyone else
          • you get the option to prevent me from caching your content

          which aren’t the same thing, two different people making the same choice

    • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this moment in time, yes they are. The lemmy.world team took down the community that was being targeted, which means that the attack has stopped (even though whoever was posting that shit got his own way). I’m bummed about having done these mass deletions but I was quite scared and that was the easiest thing to do.

      Actually, if such an issue was to re surface in the future, I have found a way to more selectively delete the incriminated content. Only side effect of that is that I have to look at those pictures myself to grab their ID; and Lord, that shit can be disturbing at times.

      Thank you for your patience and sorry about having destroyed your posts.

      • kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sorry you had to go through that. Peple are messed up, and we have to expect this sort of thing from time to time. I, too, like the “store images only on the originating server” thing. It puts responsibility where it belongs. And wouldn’t that allow for damage control by blocking the offending instance while they get their shit together?

        • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes it would. Truth be told, defederating lemmy.world would have also fixed this, but as you probably know I consider that to be the nuclear option. I’ve considered doing it, but I don’t think the .world team is to blame, they are as much of a victim as we are.